Elliott Carter (b. 1908)
Holiday Overture Symphony No. 1 Piano Concerto
While no one will ever agree on who is the most important
living American composer, Elliott Carter is often called the most eminent,
which is difficult to dispute. Now 95 years old and actively composing for
eight decades, Carter spans nearly the entire twentieth century and the
beginning of the 21st. Famous for highly demanding atonal scores using
extraordinarily sophisticated rhythms, Carter is a prime architect of modernist
music in the United States. Among his most important works are: the Double Concerto
for Piano and Harpsichord with Two Chamber Orchestras, which Stravinsky hailed
as a masterpiece, a Concerto for Orchestra which Bernstein championed, a
Grammy-winning Violin Concerto, and five string quartets, often hailed as the
most important works in the genre since Bartok, two of which were awarded
Pulitzers. His most recent compositions include his first opera, What Next?,
and a Cello Concerto for Yo-Yo Ma.
The three orchestral works presented here span only two
decades, a seemingly insignificant time frame considering Carter's longevity,
but the Holiday Overture and Symphony No. 1, both composed in the 1940s, and
the Piano Concerto from 1965 initially feel universes apart. However, this
unprecedented combination of two works from Carter's little-known earlier
"populist" style with one of the most seemingly forbidding works from his
mature difficult style reveal that the young Carter nonetheless composed highly
individual complex works and that later Carter is more approachable than most
people think.
Each work emotionally captures an important moment in
Carter's life. The Holiday Overture celebrates the Allied liberation of France.
The symphony conjures up Cape Cod seascapes and the natural landscapes of New
Mexico where the music was written. The sonic divisiveness of the piano
concerto was a direct response to the then newly-built Berlin Wall. Deeper
listening reveals many common threads such as creating larger structures from
linking episodes rather than traditional development, chamber music approaches
to orchestration where the orchestra's many voices often function as
individuals, a love of elaborate polyphony engendered at least in part from
compositional studies in Paris with the great French pedagogue Nadia Boulanger,
and music that no matter how rigorous is not afraid of occasionally being
humorous. Many of Carter's compositional devices also hark back to Carter's
boyhood mentor Charles Ives, whose maverick works no matter how complicated
always had a direct impact.
The Holiday Overture was composed on Fire Island (NY) during
the summer of 1944 and reflects the general uplifting spirit of most American
concert music composed then. France's liberation, while especially meaningful
for Carter who spent three years in Paris, was a decisive American victory and
an early harbinger of the Allied triumph ending World War Two the following
year. A triumphant attitude permeates the overture, perhaps Carter's most
bravado music. Yet, even though it sounds almost antithetical to the
introspective multi-layerings he would embark on only a few years later, Carter
considers the overture transitional. In his 1970 essay The Orchestral
Composer's Point of View (reprinted in Collected Essays and Lectures,
University of Rochester), Carter claims the overture was his first composition
"to use consciously the notion of simultaneously contrasting layers of musical
activity, which characterizes most of my more recent work". Syncopated themes,
while nowhere near his later staggering rhythmic complexity, already sit
uncomfortably within measures of common time and already become a tangled web
of cross rhythms and dissonances. Although the overture celebrates a major
German defeat, it ironically received its first performance in Germany.
Winner of the 1945 Independent Concert Music Publisher's
Contest, which was to have insured a Boston Symphony première under
Koussevitzky (one of the judges), the overture was instead first performed in
Frankfurt under Celibidache, conducting musicians reading from parts photostatted
by Carter, who in frustration, smuggled the originals out of the Symphony's
library after many months of waiting in vain for the première. Carter revised
the score in 1961, and the Boston Symphony later on more than made up for their
negligence by commissioning and giving the first performance of the Piano
Concerto.
Though completed in Santa Fe in December 1942, parts of
Symphony No. 1 date to the mid-1930s and were originally part of the early
ballet score Pocahontas, among the earliest music by Carter that he still
acknowledges. Other parts of the symphony, such as lush string chords opening
the first movement, date to the work's revision in 1954 after Carter's music
had already undergone a radical transformation. Although called Symphony No. 1,
to date there has never been a Symphony No. 2. "Symphony" appears in only two
other Carter titles: A Symphony of Three Orchestras (1977), and his recent
orchestral triptych, Symphonia: sum fluxae pretium spei (1993-96). Compared
with these massive works, Symphony No. 1 is much humbler. Scored for a small
orchestra and employing mostly diatonic harmonic vocabulary, it also sounds far
removed from Carter's subsequent musical interests. Yet, as in the Holiday
Overture, there are hints of the later Carter.
In the first movement, two basic pulses occur simultaneously
throughout creating cross rhythms in a 3/2 ratio. Tempos also change
constantly, a technique Carter later refined into his trademark metrical
modulation where speed is transformed by superimposing differing tempos and
then removing one. The second movement presents a long expansive melody which
grows without developing, foreshadowing the extremely long development-less
melodies throughout Carter's later music. The finale, probably the earliest of
the three movements to be composed, is the most populist, containing a jazzy
clarinet solo and square dance-tinged violin lines.
Carter's Piano Concerto, dedicated to Stravinsky on his 85th
birthday, was composed a full generation after the Symphony and the Holiday
Overture. Though the earliest of his solo concertos, it is in many ways the
least concerto-like. By the mid 1960s, Carter had already built the foundations
of a brand new music through chamber works where different musical strands were
presented simultaneously for the sake of contrasting rather than blending,
where differences between instrumental lines became more emphasized than
similarities. Carter was eager to expand this idea to orchestral music but the
orchestra's institutional nature greatly discouraged his experimentation.
Between the Holiday Overture and the Piano Concerto, Carter
composed few orchestral works, a ballet, The Minotaur; the Elegy for Strings,
orchestrating a chamber piece, the Variations for Orchestra which employed a
dissonant harmonic language but with relatively straight-forward rhythms and
orchestration, and the revolutionary Double Concerto which completely revamped
the way orchestra members were distributed as well as how they interacted with
one another, resulting in music that more closely resembles a large scale
chamber work than an orchestral piece. The Piano Concerto refines the approach
initiated in the Double Concerto. Rather than pitting the piano directly
against the orchestra which Carter refers to as "a society of sounds", the
piano is protected from direct confrontation with the orchestra by a concertino
group of seven musicians, flute, English horn, bass clarinet, solo violin, solo
viola, solo cello, solo double bass, which Carter describes as "mediators". That
group shares similar material with the piano whose rapid-fire music is in stark
contrast to the "elaborate ambiance" of the rest of the orchestra whose musical
materials consist of longer sustained harmonies derived from a completely
different set of triads. That is not to say that the orchestra functions as a
monolith, at times there are up to 72 different parts going on simultaneously
containing as many as eight distinct rhythmic layers combining simultaneous
accelerations, retardations and regular beating.
Divided into two roughly equal-length movements, the
Concerto begins and ends with unaccompanied piano. In the first movement, the
concertino group engages in dialogue with the piano with occasional intrusions
from the orchestra which remains mostly subdued. In the second movement, the
orchestra explodes in a brutal sonic assault eventually disappearing, leaving
only the piano and the concertino group, with the piano alone quietly having
the last word. It is the opposite of the glorious fanfares in Carter's earlier
music, but it's ultimately still heroic. Though one of Carter's most astringent
scores, when heard in the context of his earlier, more approachable works, the
Concerto can be heard in a new light. Like his earlier music, it brims with
relentless energy. Behind the web of layers, lurks a powerful and deeply moving
tour-de-force.
Frank J. Oteri