Fryderyk Chopin (1810-1849) Complete Piano Music Vol. 12 Scherzi and Impromptus Allegro de concert Fryderyk Chopin was born in 1810 at Zelazowa Wola, near...
Fryderyk Chopin
(1810-1849)
Complete Piano Music
Vol. 12
Scherzi and Impromptus
Allegro de concert
Fryderyk Chopin was
born in 1810 at Zelazowa Wola, near Warsaw. His father Nicolas Chopin was
French by birth but had moved to Poland to work as an accounting clerk, later
serving as tutor to the Laczynski family and thereafter to the family of Count
Skarbek, one of whose poorer relatives he married. His subsequent career led
him to the Warsaw Lyceum as a respected teacher of French, and it was there
that his only son, Fryderyk, godson of Count Skarbek, whose Christian name he
took, passed his childhood.
Chopin showed an early
talent for music. He learned the piano from his mother and later with the
eccentric Adalbert Zywny, a violinist of Bohemian origin, and as fiercely
Polish as Chopin's father. His later training in music was with Jozef Elsner,
director of the Warsaw Conservatory, at first as a private pupil and then as a
student of that institution.
In the 1820s Chopin
had already begun to win for himself a considerable local reputation, but
Warsaw offered relatively limited opportunities. In 1830 he set out for Vienna,
a city where he had aroused interest on a visit in the previous year and where
he now hoped to make a more lasting impression. The time, however, was
ill-suited to his purpose. Vienna was not short of pianists, and Thalberg, in
particular, had out-played the rest of the field. During the months he spent
there Chopin attracted little attention, and resolved to move to Paris.
The greater part of
Chopin's professional career was to be spent in France, and particularly in
Paris, where he established himself as a fashionable teacher and as a performer
in the houses of the rich. His playing in the concert hall was of a style less
likely to please than that of the more flamboyant Liszt or than the technical
virtuosity of Kalkbrenner. It was in the more refined ambience of the
fashionable salon that his genius as a composer and as a performer, with its
intimacy, elegance and delicacy of nuance, found its place.
In 1848 political
disturbances in Paris made teaching impossible, and Chopin left the city for a
tour of England and Scotland. By this time his health had deteriorated
considerably. At the end of the year he returned to Paris, now too weak to play
or to teach and dependent on the generosity of others for subsistence. He died
there on 17th October, 1849.
The greater part of
Chopin's music was written for his own instrument, the piano. At first it
seemed that works for piano and orchestra would be a necessary part of his
stock-in-trade, but the position he found for himself in Paris enabled him to
write principally for the piano alone, in a characteristic idiom that derives
some inspiration from contemporary Italian opera, much from the music of
Poland, and still more from his own adventurous approach to harmony and his own
sheer technical ability as a player. The Impromptu, in title at least,
was typical of its period in its suggestion of romantic abandon and freedom. In
common with much else in European music, it had its origins in Prague with the
publication in 1822 of Impromptus by Jan Vaclav Vorisek, followed five
years later by the Bohemian-born composer Marschner. Schubert's publisher in
the 1820s, Tobias Haslinger, found the title commercially attractive, and
thereafter the name endured, descriptive of an independent piano piece, lacking
the formality of a sonata movement.
The four Scherzi explore
a new form of piano composition. Originally a musical joke, with Beethoven the scherzo
had come to replace the more limited minuet as the third movement of a
symphony. Chopin, however, made of it an independent virtuoso form. He
completed his first Scherzo in 1832 and dedicated it to Tomas Albrecht,
wine-merchant and Saxon consul in Paris and a good friend, who was present at
the composer's death-bed in 1849. Two emphatic chords summon attention before
the impetuous principal material of the piece makes its appearance, with its
contrasting B major trio section, a Polish folk-song transformed into a Berceuse.
The second Scherzo, Opus 31 in B flat minor and D flat major, was
written in 1837 and dedicated to a pupil, Countess Adalè von Fürstenstein. Once
again the Scherzo opens with a call to attention, this time ominously
quiet, until the answering burst of sound, followed by a display of agility,
leading to a central oasis of general A major tranquillity that is not without
passing excitement. The third Scherzo, in the key of C sharp minor,
belied in its opening, was written in 1839 and dedicated to his favourite
pupil, Adolf Gutmann, one of the few professional pupils that he took during a
teaching career largely devoted to the interests of rich amateurs. Marked Presto
con fuoco, the Scherzo embarks on a series of open octaves with
which and with wider intervals Gutmann would be well able to cope and includes
a central D flat major passage in contrast. The last of these pieces, the Scherzo
in E major, Opus 54, composed in 1842 and published with a dedication to
his pupil Countess Jeanne de Caraman, after its introduction, moves into the
fairy scherzo territory of Mendelssohn, a delicately nuanced conclusion to the
series, ending with an appropriate flourish.
Chopin wrote his first
Impromptu in 1837, the year of his first liaison with George Sand, dedicating
the work, as he so often did, to one of his society pupils, the Countess
Caroline de Lobau. Its delicate and lively outer sections enclose a more
sustained F minor passage at the heart of the work. The second Impromptu followed
two years later, to be issued by Chopin's new publisher Troupenas, who had
temporarily replaced Maurice Schlesinger, whom he suspected of duplicity. The
left hand establishes a pattern of chordal accompaniment, before the entry of
the well-known principal melody and its elaborate embellishment. There is a
lilting D major section and an F major restatement of the main theme before a
passage of filigree ornament leads to a conclusion. By 1843 Chopin had returned
to Schlesinger, who published his third Impromptu in that year, with a
dedication to Countess Jeanne Esterhazy, nee Batthyany, a member by birth and
by marriage of one of the leading families of the Habsburg Empire. Following a
pattern he often used, Chopin frames a more sustained central section in the
relative minor key with music of a livelier turn. The Fantaisie-Impromptu, published
posthumously in 1855, predates the other three Impromptus and was
completed in 1835. Its intense and excited outer sections frame a central Largo
in D flat major, in which, as so often, an arpeggio left-hand accompaniment
points an upper singing melody.
The Allegro de
concert, Opus 46, was conceived originally as a movement of a projected
piano concerto in 1831, when it seemed Chopin might still have use for such
material. It was revised as a solo work and published in 1841, with a
dedication to a new pupil, Friederike Müller, who noted in her diary the
physical weakness of her teacher, his coughing and remedy of opium drops with
sugar and his enormous patience. The Allegro de concert preserves
something of the rhetoric expected in a concerto.
Interpreting Chopin by
Idil Biret
Although the romantic
era in its music and its performances is not so far from our own time, for
various reasons we seem to have distanced ourselves from it. As a consequence,
often composers very different from one another like Chopin, Liszt, Schumann
and Wagner are brought under the same title of Romantic Composers. In this
context it is quite normal to find Chopin and Liszt mentioned together as
composers of similar style, while there are no two sound worlds as different
from one another as those of Chopin and Liszt. The conception of the piano
sound that Chopin created is based on the model of the voice. Liszt, on the
other hand, fascinated by the development of the modern piano during his
period, challenges the orchestra in an attempt to reproduce on the piano the
richness of the orchestral palette.
It must be among the
fondest wishes of any pianist to be able to have heard Chopin perform his own
music. Fortunately there are some recordings providing indirectly some evidence
of this way of approaching the piano. One may in particular mention the
recordings of Raoul von Koczalski who studied with Chopin's pupil Karol Mikuli.
It is also enlightening to listen to the recordings of Cortot, a pupil of
Decombes who received precious counsel from Chopin. Further, Friedman, de
Pachmann and Paderewski who were not direct descendants of Chopin were still
close enough to his aesthetic conceptions to be able to convey the spontaneity
Chopin is said to have brought to his playing as well as the polyphonic and
rhythmic richness which are so apparent in Chopin's conception of the piano. In
spite of the inferior quality of the recordings from the earlier part of this
century, a considerable number of common points are audible in the performances
of these pianists. Notably, a very fine legato, a piano sound that never loses
its roundness since intensity replaces force, the exact feeling of rubato,
recognition of the importance of inner voices and consequently a remarkable
sense of polyphony. Contrary to the popular image of the romantic virtuoso,
simplicity and naturalness remain exemplary in the way these great Chopin
interpreters approach music.
It is interesting to
note also the evidence left by musicians, contemporaries of Chopin, and
Chopin's pupils about his interpretations. A perfect legato drawing its
inspiration from bel canto and unimaginable richness in tone-colour were the
product of subtle variations in a sound full of charm and a purity that lost
none of its fullness even in its forte passages. Chopin could not sound
aggressive, especially on the pianos of that period. Berlioz wrote, "To be
able to appreciate Chopin fully, I think one must hear him from close by, in the
salon rather than in a theatre."
Chopin's sense of
rubato was unrivalled. The temps derobe (stolen time) assumed under the
hands of the great master its true meaning. Mikuli gives a description of the
rubato as Chopin conceived it, which seems to be of penetrating clarity. After
recalling that Chopin was inflexible in keeping the tempo and that the
metronome was always on his piano, Mikuli explains, "Even in his rubato,
where one hand - the accompanying one - continues to play strictly in time, the
other - the hand which sings the melody - freed from all metric restraint
conveys the true musical expression, impatience, like someone whose speech
becomes fiery with enthusiasm."
Together with a
certain classicism, moderation was the basis of the world of Chopin. Hence,
playing his music on the powerful modern pianos and in large concert halls is
often problematic. One should ideally never go beyond a self-imposed limit of
sound and keep in mind as the criteria the possibilities of the human voice. It
is therefore better to somewhat reduce sonority without sacrificing the quality
of the sound.
In performing Chopin's
works one should neither try to reconstruct nor imitate the interpretations of
the past which remain unique, but try, with the help of all the recorded and
written material we are lucky to possess, to penetrate deeper into the musical
texts and advance further in the unending quest for a better understanding of
the art of Chopin.