Fryderyk Chopin (1810-1849) Complete Piano Music Vol. 13 Waltzes Contredanse 3 Ecossaises Tarantelle Fryderyk Chopin was born near Warsaw in 1810, the son...
Fryderyk Chopin
(1810-1849)
Complete Piano Music
Vol. 13
Waltzes
Contredanse
3 Ecossaises
Tarantelle
Fryderyk Chopin was born near Warsaw in 1810, the son of a French
emigre, Nicolas Chopin, who had established himself in Poland as a teacher of
French, married a Polish wife and embraced his new nationality with the
greatest patriotic enthusiasm. Chopin himself was to settle in Paris and remain
chiefly in France for the greater part of his career. At the same time he
retained his full share of Polish patriotism, associating with refugees from
Poland and grieving for the fate of his country under continued Russian
domination.
Chopin's early career was in Warsaw, where he studied at first privately
with the Director of the Conservatory, Jozef Elsner, before continuing with the
same teacher as a student at the Conservatory. He was already beginning to win
something of a reputation at home, when he took the inevitable and natural
decision to seek his fortune in the wider musical world. A visit to Vienna in 1829
seemed promising, with a good response from the public to his Polish music, in
spite of the grumbling of orchestral players, handed illegible parts. This
first success was not repeated when Chopin returned to Vienna in the autumn of
the following year, now in earnest. He passed there a winter of considerable
discontent.
In July 1831, Chopin set out for Paris, having with some difficulty
procured a passport that would have taken him to London, a less revolutionary
part of Europe, at which the Vienna authorities looked less askance. Poland
itself was in turmoil, and Russia had finally occupied the country, to his
patriotic dismay. Paris was to prove a centre for Polish nationalists, and it
was in these circles that Chopin was first to mix.
In Paris Chopin was not, in any case, without friends and connections,
and he was to establish himself as a teacher of the piano to the most
distinguished families, and as a performer at elegant soirees in the French
capital. At first he entertained considerable suspicion of the unorthodox
behaviour of musicians like Liszt, and his Bohemian associates. Nevertheless by
1837 he had embarked on a liaison with the writer George Sand (Baroness Dudevant), a woman whose femininity he had
first doubted.
The affair with George
Sand was to continue for ten years, allowing Chopin to retreat in summer to her
country house at Nohant, and bringing in 1838 a very much less desirable winter
in Mallorca, which decisively weakened his health, already debilitated by
tubercular infection. The couple finally separated in 1847, after a period in
which George Sand's two children, Maurice and Solange, made life difficult
either by their resentment, in the case of the former, or by enlisting his
support, as Solange did, against her mother.
The political
disturbances in Paris in 1848 deprived Chopin of his usual sources of income,
and he took the occasion to visit England and Scotland. By this time, however,
his health was already extremely weak. He returned to Paris at the end of the
year and died there on l7th October 1849.
As a composer Chopin
was innovative. In particular he developed his own idiosyncratic and poetic way
of playing, lacking the thunder and histrionics of Liszt and Thalberg, but
offering instead an infinite range of delicate nuances. In melody he was
influenced by the Italian opera of Bellini and Donizetti, while in harmony he
devised his own remarkably adventurous language that later composers were to
extend still further.
The waltz, a German
country-dance in origin, had, by the end of the eighteenth century, won
considerable popularity in the ball-room, in spite of the warnings of doctors
and moralists, who feared physical and spiritual degeneration as a result. Even
Lord Byron objected. Fashion, however, could not be denied, and the waltz was
to grow in popularity, particularly with the help in Vienna of Lanner and the
Strauss family. The dance made its way into opera and into ballet, and, with
the work of composers like Chopin, into the salon. It was to undergo a later
apotheosis in the concert hall in the symphonies of Bruckner, Mahler and
Tchaikovsky, and in the evocative choreographic poem of Ravel, La valse.
Chopin had first
turned to the form in Warsaw in 1827, having already adapted Polish dances, the
Mazurka and the Polonasie, to his artistic purposes. He was to
continue to write waltzes until the year before his death. Within the form
itself there still remains scope for variety of harmony and melody and even of
speed and mood, since these dances are not intended for the ball-room. It might
be added that there is no sign of a final flagging of spirits. The last three
surviving waltzes that Chopin was to write, in 1846 and 1847, open with the
famous "Minute" Waltz, published with the rather less
exuberant C sharp minor Waltz and the remarkable, chromatic A flat Waltz
that completes the set of Opus 64.
It should be added
that Chopin's dislike of writing his music down has complicated the work of
later editors and scholars. The opus numbers do not represent the order of composition
of the Waltzes, with the B minor Waltz, Opus 169 No. 2, and the Waltz
in D flat, Opus 70 No. 3, the work of 1829, and similar
discrepancies of opus number and date of composition throughout.
The listing of the
complete Chopin waltzes here recorded includes, for greater clarity, the
chronological numbers assigned by Maurice Brown (Chopin: An Index of his Works
in Chronological Order). Julian Fontana, a musician who was a contemporary of
Chopin in Warsaw, later settled in France, near Paris, and copied out some
eighty of Chopin's compositions by hand and after Chopin's death was
responsible for the publication of works numbered from Opus 66 to Opus 77. It
is his version of these later publications that is here followed.
Chopin's short G
flat major Contredanse, with its C flat major Trio, was composed in
1827 and perhaps sent to the composer's intimate friend Titus Woyciechowski as
a name-day present. The three Ecossaises written during his student days
in Warsaw in 1826 use a form based on a French ball-room conception of a
Scottish dance, with foreign echoes of the pipes in a form that had acquired
considerable popularity in the earlier years of the nineteenth century,
whatever its national origin. The A flat major Tarantelle of 1841
preserves the more typical form of the energetic dance, reputedly either caused
by or a cure for the bite of the tarantula spider. In the hands of
Chopin and of Liszt it is a vehicle for virtuosity.
Interpreting Chopin by
Idil Biret
Although the romantic
era in its music and its performances is not so far from our own time, for
various reasons we seem to have distanced ourselves from it. As a consequence,
often composers very different from one another like Chopin, Liszt, Schumann
and Wagner are brought under the same title of Romantic Composers. In this
context it is quite normal to find Chopin and Liszt mentioned together as
composers of similar style, while there are no two sound worlds as different
from one another as those of Chopin and Liszt. The conception of the piano
sound that Chopin created is based on the model of the voice. Liszt, on the
other hand, fascinated by the development of the modern piano during his
period, challenges the orchestra in an attempt to reproduce on the piano the
richness of the orchestral palette.
It must be among the
fondest wishes of any pianist to be able to have heard Chopin perform his own
music. Fortunately there are some recordings providing indirectly some evidence
of this way of approaching the piano. One may in particular mention the
recordings of Raoul von Koczalski who studied with Chopin's pupil Karol Mikuli.
It is also enlightening to listen to the recordings of Cortot, a pupil of
Decombes who received precious counsel from Chopin. Further, Friedman, de
Pachmann and Paderewski who were not direct descendants of Chopin were still
close enough to his aesthetic conceptions to be able to convey the spontaneity
Chopin is said to have brought to his playing as well as the polyphonic and
rhythmic richness which are so apparent in Chopin's conception of the piano. In
spite of the inferior quality of the recordings from the earlier part of this
century, a considerable number of common points are audible in the performances
of these pianists. Notably, a very fine legato, a piano sound that never loses
its roundness since intensity replaces force, the exact feeling of rubato,
recognition of the importance of inner voices and consequently a remarkable
sense of polyphony. Contrary to the popular image of the romantic virtuoso,
simplicity and naturalness remain exemplary in the way these great Chopin
interpreters approach music.
It is interesting to
note also the evidence left by musicians, contemporaries of Chopin, and
Chopin's pupils about his interpretations. A perfect legato drawing its inspiration
from bel canto and unimaginable richness in tone-colour were the product of
subtle variations in a sound full of charm and a purity that lost none of its
fullness even in its forte passages. Chopin could not sound aggressive,
especially on the pianos of that period. Berlioz wrote, "To be able to
appreciate Chopin fully, I think one must hear him from close by, in the salon
rather than in a theatre."
Chopin's sense of
rubato was unrivalled. The temps derobe (stolen time) assumed under the
hands of the great master its true meaning. Mikuli gives a description of the
rubato as Chopin conceived it, which seems to be of penetrating clarity. After
recalling that Chopin was inflexible in keeping the tempo and that the
metronome was always on his piano, Mikuli explains, "Even in his rubato,
where one hand - the accompanying one - continues to play strictly in time, the
other - the hand which sings the melody - freed from all metric restraint
conveys the true musical expression, impatience, like someone whose speech
becomes fiery with enthusiasm."
Together with a
certain classicism, moderation was the basis of the world of Chopin. Hence,
playing his music on the powerful modern pianos and in large concert halls is
often problematic. One should ideally never go beyond a self-imposed limit of
sound and keep in mind as the criteria the possibilities of the human voice. It
is therefore better to somewhat reduce sonority without sacrificing the quality
of the sound.
In performing Chopin's
works one should neither try to reconstruct nor imitate the interpretations of
the past which remain unique, but try, with the help of all the recorded and
written material we are lucky to possess, to penetrate deeper into the musical
texts and advance further in the unending quest for a better understanding of
the art of Chopin.