Dmitri Shostakovich (1906 - 1975) Symphony No.6 in B Minor, Op. 54 Symphony No.12 in D Minor, Op.112 Dmitri Shostakovich was born in St. Petersburg in 1906,...
Dmitri Shostakovich (1906 - 1975)
Symphony No.6 in B Minor, Op. 54
Symphony No.12 in D Minor, Op.112
Dmitri Shostakovich was born in St. Petersburg in 1906, the son of an
engineer. He had his first piano lessons from his mother when he was nine and
showed such musical precocity that he was able at the age of thirteen to enter
the Petrograd Conservatory, where he had piano lessons from Leonid Nikolayev and
studied composition with the son-in-law of Rimsky-Korsakov, Maximilian
Steinberg. He continued his studies through the difficult years of the civil
war, positively encouraged by Glazunov, the director of the Conservatory, and
helping to support his family, particularly after the death of his father in
1922, by working as a cinema pianist, in spite of his own indifferent health,
weakened by the privations of the time. He completed his course as a pianist in
1923 and graduated in composition in 1925. His graduation work, the First
Symphony, was performed in Leningrad in May 1926 and won considerable success,
followed by performances in the years immediately following in Berlin and in
Philadelphia. As a pianist he was proficient enough to win an honourable mention
at the International Chopin Competition in Warsaw.
Shostakovich in his early career was closely involved with the theatre, and
in particular with the Leningrad Working Youth Theatre, in musical collaboration
in Meyerhold's Moscow production of Mayakovsky's The Flea and in film
music, notably New Babylon. His opera The Nose, based on Gogol,
was completed in 1928 and given its first concert performance in Leningrad in
June 1929, when it provoked considerable hostility from the vociferous and
increasingly powerful proponents of the cult of the Proletarian in music and the
arts. The controversy aroused was a foretaste of difficulties to come. His
ballet The Golden Age was staged without success in Leningrad in October 1930.
Orchestral compositions of these years included a second and third symphony,
each a tactful answer to politically motivated criticism.
In 1934 Shostakovich won acclaim for his opera Lady Macbeth of the
Mtsensk District, based on a novella by the 19th century Russian writer Nikolay
Leskov, and performed in Leningrad and shortly afterwards, under the title
Katerina Ismailova, in Moscow. Leskov's story deals with a bourgeois crime, the
murder of her merchant husband by the heroine of the title, and the opera seemed
at first thoroughly acceptable in political as well as musical terms. Its
condemnation in Pravda in January 1936, apparently at the direct instigation of
Stalin, was a significant and dangerous reverse, leading to the withdrawal from
rehearsal that year of his Fourth Symphony and the composition the
following year of a Fifth Symphony, described, in terms to which
Shostakovich had no overt objection, as a Soviet artist's creative reply to
justified criticism. Performed in Leningrad in November 1937, the symphony was
warmly welcomed, allowing his reinstatement as one of the leading Russian
composers of the time.
In 1941 Shostakovich received the Stalin prize for his Piano Quintet.
In the same year Russia became involved in war, with Hitler's invasion of the
country and the siege of Leningrad, commemorated by Shostakovich in his Seventh
Symphony, a work he had begun under siege conditions and completed after his
evacuation to Kuibyshev.
Stricter cultural control enforced in the years following the end of the war
led, in 1948, to a further explicit attack on Shostakovich, coupled now with
Prokofiev, Miaskovsky and Khachaturian, and branded as formalists, exhibiting
anti-democratic tendencies. The official condemnation brought, of course, social
and practical difficulties. The response of Shostakovich was to hold back
certain of his compositions from public performance. His first Violin
Concerto, written for David Oistrakh, was not performed until after the
death of Stalin in 1953, when he returned to the symphony with his Tenth, which
met a mixed reception when it was first performed in Leningrad in December 1953.
His next two symphonies avoided perilous excursions into liberalisation, the
first of them celebrating The Year 1905 and the fortieth anniversary of
the October Revolution of 1917 in 1957, and the second The Year 1917,
completed in 1961.
In 1962 there came the first performance of the Thirteenth Symphony, with its
settings of controversial poems by Yevtushenko, and a revival of the revised
version of Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District, under the title Katerina
Ismailova. The opera now proved once more acceptable.
The last dozen years of the life of Shostakovich, during which he suffered a
continuing deterioration of health, brought intense activity as a composer, with
a remarkable series of works, many of them striving for still further simplicity
and lucidity of style. The remarkable Fourteenth Symphony of 1969, settings of
poems by Apollinaire, Lorca, Rilke and Küchelbecker, dedicated to his friend
Benjamin Britten, was followed in 1971 by the last of the fifteen symphonies, a
work of some ambiguity. The last of his fifteen string quartets was completed
and performed in 1974 and his final composition, the Viola Sonata, in July 1975.
He died on 9th August.
The career of Shostakovich must be seen against the political and cultural
background of his time and country. Born in the year after Bloody Sunday, when
peaceful demonstrators in St. Petersburg had been fired on by troops,
Shostakovich had his musical education under the new Soviet regime. His own
political sympathies have been questioned and there has been controversy
particularly over the publication Testimony, The Memoirs of Dmitri Shostakovich,
as related to and edited by Solomon Volkov, once accused of fabrication in his
portrayal of the composer as a covert enemy of Bolshevism. The testimony of
others and a recent scholarly survey of the life and work of Shostakovich
suggest that the general tenor of Volkov's Testimony is true enough.
Shostakovich belonged to a family of liberal tradition, whose sympathies would
have lain with the demonstrators of 1905. Under Stalinism, however, whatever
initial enthusiasm he may have felt for the new order would have evaporated with
the attacks on artistic integrity and the menacing attempts to direct all
creative expression to the aims of socialist realism. While writers and painters
may express meaning more obviously, composers have a more ambiguous art, so that
the meaning of music, if it has any meaning beyond itself, may generally be
hidden. Shostakovich learned how to wear the necessary public mask that enabled
him to survive the strictures of 1936 and 1948 without real sacrifice of
artistic integrity.
Shostakovich wrote his Sixth Symphony in 1939, star1ing it in April
and completing the work in October. The pre-war years had brought great
suffering and the death of musicians, actors, writers and poets, in Stalin's
desire for political or1hodoxy and the establishment of art that reflected the
principles of Socialist Realism. By 1939, however, it had proved necessary to
consider a non-aggression pact with Hitler's Germany, eventually signed in
August 1939, on the eve of Hitler's attack on Poland. Political circumstances
dictated a less rigorous control of music, which would prove to have propaganda
value abroad, if couched in more conventional bourgeois terms. The Sixth
Symphony, however, written under what might be regarded in part as more
favourable conditions, proved puzzling to contemporary critics. It was first
performed in Leningrad on 5th November 1939 under the conductor Mravinsky at a
Festival of Soviet Music which also included first performances of Prokofiev's Alexander
Nevsky cantata and of Shaporin's On the Field of Kulikovo, these two
works of obvious and immediate patriotic appeal. Shostakovich, perhaps as a
subterfuge, had promised a symphony on the subject of Lenin. The new symphony
was no such thing. Instead there was a three-movement work, starting not with a
symphonic first movement but an extended brooding Largo, followed by two very
much shor1er movements, relatively light-hear1ed in vein. The Sixth Symphony
is scored for an orchestra of piccolo, pairs of flutes and oboes, cor anglais, a
pair of clarinets with an additional E flat clarinet and bass clarinet, two
bassoons and double bassoon, three trumpets, four horns, three trombones and
tuba, timpani, tambourine, snare drum, triangle, cymbals, bass drum, tam-tam and
xylophone, harp, celesta and strings. The instrumentation provides the
opportunity for wide varieties of orchestral colour, but is some way from the
extravagant instrumentation of the Fourth Symphony. The opening Largo is
sombre in mood, based on elements of its principal theme, announced at the
beginning of the movement and a later closely related theme for cor anglais. The
music leads through an extended meditative passage for two flutes to the return
of aversion of the opening, proceeding, as the sound dies away, to the end of
the movement. The influence of Bach has been suggested, in particular of the St.
Matthew Passion, a work Shostakovich was studying with students at the St.
Petersburg Conservatory, where he had recently been appointed professor of
composition. The second movement, in what might seem ironic juxtaposition, is
opened by the pert E flat clarinet, accompanied by the plucked strings of the
violins. A dynamic climax, followed by the timpani, leads to are turn of an
inverted version of the opening and finally to an ending marked in the wind pppp.
The last movement starts in an ironic mood recalling that of Prokofiev in the Classical
Symphony in a world of Mahlerian variety, with elements of the banal
included in a truer reflection of the universal than Socialist Realism, with its
descent into popular philistinism, could propose.
If the Sixth Symphony abandoned any attempt to portray Lenin, the Twelfth
Symphony of Shostakovich, completed in 1961, returned initially to this once
declared intention. In the end, however, the new symphony, although dedicated to
the memory of Lenin, reflects the events of its title, The Year 1917. The
original intention had been to open the work with music recalling Lenin's youth,
going on in a second movement to portray Lenin as leader of the October
Revolution. The third movement would commemorate the death of Lenin and the
fourth life after Lenin, following the path that he had revealed. The earlier
idea of using poetic texts by Mayakovsky and others was abandoned, and the
symphony was completed as a purely instrumental work, opening with Revolutionary
Petrograd. Razliv is the place near which Lenin remained in hiding and the
"Aurora" was the battle-cruiser that fired the shots at the Winter
Palace that started the October Revolution. The title of the last movement, The
Dawn of Humanity, is self-explanatory. The symphony was first performed on 1st
October 1961 in Leningrad, where it was well received. In Western Europe the
following year it was greeted coldly as an exercise in political conformism.
The Twelfth Symphony is scored for a less elaborate orchestra than the
Sixth. It opens in sombre Russian mood, its first subject announced by
cellos and double basses, leading to a second subject, both associated with the
popular struggle, then developed in an excited central section. Drums briefly
introduce Razliv, a slow movement, Lenin's dark night of the soul before the
October Revolution. It is difficult not to suspect a tongue-in-cheek element in
the music, particularly when reference is made to the Funeral March for the
Victims of the Revolution, a work long discarded in which Shostakovich
commemorated the death of a boy whom he had seen killed by a Cossack sabre in
St. Petersburg. This may, with hindsight at least, suggest that Shostakovich saw
Lenin as the cause of the slaughter and suffering that the Revolution brought.
The third movement is marked by cross rhythms in music that is again
thematically related to what has gone before. The banal seems to intrude further
into the last movement of what is in many ways a very Russian symphony, although
one may still suspect the irony here perceived by some in the conclusion of
Tchaikovsky's Fifth Symphony.
Czecho-Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra (Bratislava)
The Czecho-Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra (Bratislava). the oldest symphonic
ensemble in Slovakia, was founded in 1929. The orchestra's first conductor was
Frantisek Dyk and over the past sixty years it has worked under the direction
of several prominent Czech and Slovak conductors. The orchestra has made many
recordings for the Naxos label ranging from the ballet music of Tchaikovsky to
more modern works by composers such as Copland, Britten and Prokofiev.
Ladislav Slovak
Ladislav Slovak was born in 1919 in the Slovak capital, Bratislava, where, in
spite of straitened circumstances, he completed his earlier musical training at
the City Music School and subsequently at the Bratislava Conservatory. As a
conductor he was greatly influenced by Vaclav Talich in Bratislava and from 1954
by Yevgeni Mravinsky, to whom he served as assistant in Leningrad. For some two
years Slovak attended Mravinsky's rehearsals with the Leningrad Philharmonic
Orchestra of the symphonies of Shostakovich, including first performances of
Symphonies Nos. 11 and 12. In these rehearsals Shostakovich was present, hearing
his music in performance for the first time and rarely interfering, except for
occasional adjustments of tempi. He had great confidence in Mravinsky, with whom
there was collaboration at the profoundest musical level. Slovak was privileged
often to take part in discussions on problems of performance between Mravinsky
and Shostakovich, and also learned much from other conductors, including the
second conductor of the Leningrad Philharmonic, Kurt Sanderling. On his return
to Czecho-Slovakia Slovak was appointed Conductor-in-Chief of the Czecho-Slovak
Radio Symphony Orchestra in Bratislava, with guest engagements with the Czech
Philharmonic Orchestra, which he conducted on an extended world tour to the Far
East, Australasia and Russia in 1959. In 1961 he was appointed
Conductor-in-Chief of the Slovak Philharmonic Orchestra and has continued with
similar appointments as far afield as Australia and with a busy career as a
guest conductor. His early working collaboration with Mravinsky and Shostakovich
has led to performances of particular authority, in particular of the latter's
fifteen symphonies.