Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky (1840 - 1893) Symphony No. 2 in C Minor, Op. 17 "Little Russian" Symphony No.4 in F Minor, Op. 36 Pyotr Il'yich...
Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky (1840 - 1893)
Symphony No. 2 in C Minor, Op. 17 "Little Russian"
Symphony No.4 in F Minor, Op. 36
Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky must be regarded as the most popular
of all Russian composers, his music offering certain obvious, superficial attractions in
its melodies and in the richness of its orchestral colouring. There is more to Tchaikovsky
than this, and it would be a mistake to neglect his achievement because of what sometimes
seems to be an excess of popular attention.
Born in Kamsko-Votkinsk in 1840, the second son of a mining
engineer, Tchaikovsky had his early education, in music as in everything else, at home,
under the care of his mother and of a beloved governess. From the age of ten he was a
pupil at the School of Jurisprudence in St. Petersburg, completing his course there in
1859 to take employment in the Ministry of Justice. During these years he developed his
abilities as a musician and it must have seemed probable that he would, like his
contemporaries Mussorgsky, Cui, Rimsky-Korsakov and Borodin, keep music as a secondary
occupation, while following another career.
For Tchaikovsky matters turned out differently. The foundation
of the new Conservatory of Music in St. Petersburg under Anton Rubinstein enabled him to
study there as a full-time student from 1863. In 1865 he moved to Moscow as a member of
the staff of the new Conservatory established by Anton Rubinstein's brother Nikolay. He
continued there for some ten years, before financial assistance from a rich widow,
Nadezhda von Meck, enabled him to leave the Conservatory and devote himself entirely to
composition. The same period in his life brought an unfortunate marriage to a
self-proclaimed admirer of his work, a woman who showed early signs of mental instability,
and could only add further to Tchaikovsky's own problems of character and inclination. His
homosexuality was a torment to him, while his morbid sensitivity and diffidence, coupled
with physical revulsion for the woman he had married, led to a severe nervous break-down.
Separation from his wife, which was immediate, still left
practical and personal problems to be solved. Tchaikovsky's relationship with Nadezhda von
Meck, however, provided not only the money that at first was necessary for his career, but
also the understanding and support of a woman who, so far from making physical demands of
him, never even met him face to face. This curiously remote liaison only came to an end in
1890, when, on the false plea of bankruptcy, Nadezhda von Meck discontinued an allowance
that was no longer of importance, and a correspondence on which he had come to depend.
The story of Tchaikovsky's death in St. Petersburg in 1893 is
now generally known. It seems that a member of the nobility had threatened to complain to
the Tsar about an alleged homosexual relationship between Tchaikovsky and his son. To
avoid open scandal a court of honour of Tchaikovsky's old school-fellows met and condemned
him to death, forcing him to take his own life. His death was announced as the result of
cholera, and this official version of the event was, until relatively recently, generally
accepted.
As a composer Tchaikovsky represented a happy synthesis of the
West European or German school of composition, represented in Russia by his teacher Anton
Rubinstein, and the Russian nationalists, led by the impossibly aggressive Balakirev. From
Rubinstein Tchaikovsky learned his technique, while Balakirev attempted time and again to
bully him into compliance with his own ideals. To the nationalists Tchaikovsky may have
seemed relatively foreign. His work, after all, lacked the primitive crudity that
sometimes marked their compositions. Nevertheless acceptance abroad was not universal.
Hanslick, in Vienna, could deplore the "trivial Cossack cheer" of the violin
concerto and other works, while welcoming the absence of any apparent Russian element in
the last of the six symphonies. In England and America there had been a heartier welcome,
and in the latter country he had been received with an enthusiasm that exceeded even that
at home. In his diary of the American concert tour of 1891 he remarked on this and on the
curious habit of American critics, who tended to concentrate their attention on the
appearance and posture of a conductor, rather than on the music itself. At the age of 51
he was described in the American press as "a tall, gray, interesting man, well on to
sixty".
In 1872 Tchaikovsky spent part of the summer at Kamenka at the
house of his elder sister Sasha, a welcome respite from his now irksome duties at the
Moscow Conservatory, an institution threatened by a chronic shortage of money. July
brought a visit to Kiev, to the house of his friend Kondratyev at Nizy and to the
consumptive Shilovsky at Usovo, during the course of which he nearly lost the sketches of
a second symphony, which he had started at Kamenka. Known as The Little Russian, the
symphony was completed by the end of the year and Tchaikovsky was able to play through the
Finale at the Rimsky-Korsakovs in St. Petersburg at Christmas. The work received its
first performance in Moscow in February 1873, to be repeated in April and to be played in
St. Petersburg in March, to the approval of the group of nationalist composers, whose
principles it seemed to endorse. The whole work was extensively revised by the composer in
1880.
The first movement was completely rewritten by Tchaikovsky, to
his own satisfaction but not always to that of later critics. The Andante sostenuto
opening offers a folk-tune from the Ukraine, a region known as Little Russia. The melody
is introduced by the horn and echoed by the bassoon, later to be taken over fragmentarily
by other instruments. The exposition of the movement, marked Allegro vivo, is succinctly
expressed, with the initial folk-song re-appearing in the development, and making a return
in conclusion.
Tchaikovsky claimed only to have rescored the second movement,
which had been retrieved from a Wedding March in the third act of his rejected opera Undine. In structure it is in three principal
sections, its central portion a Ukrainian folk-song, while the outer framework is built in
a similar form, the march itself enclosing a contrasting passage.
The Scherzo, allegedly shortened and rescored, shows the
influence of Borodins First Symphony
in its rhythmic variety. It has a contrasting Trio, opened by oboes, clarinets, bassoons
and horns, to be joined by the violins in a countermelody, in a movement that demonstrates
again the composer's early mastery of orchestral colour.
The Finale opens in grandiose style, leading to another
Ukrainian folk-song, The Crane, similar in
contour to the Promenade theme used by Mussorgsky in his Pictures at an Exhibition. This melody provides
material for both introduction and first subject, while the second subject offers a number
of harmonic ambiguities with an attractively lop-sided dance-rhythm. The central
development makes full use of the two themes, with a recapitulation that takes us into
unexpected keys before the C major conclusion.
The fourth of Tchaikovsky's six symphonies was completed in
early January, 1878, and given its first performance in Moscow six weeks later. In May and
early June 1877 he had completed sketches of the whole symphony. On 1st June he had met
his future wife for the first time and had proposed to her a few days later. Meanwhile he
was occupied too with the composition of his opera Eugene
Onegin. On 18th July he married: by 7th August he had left for his
brother-in-law's estate at Kamenka to escape from a wife to whom he had taken an
invincible aversion. By the end of September, after attempted suicide, his marriage was at
an end, and in October he left Russia to find solace in travel. Work on the symphony
continued, even in these extraordinary circumstances, and its first performance was given
in his absence.
In a letter to Nadezhda von Meck Tchaikovsky suggested, with
various reservations, a programme for the Fourth Symphony. The seed of the whole symphony
lay in the opening theme, representing Fate, a threatening sword of Damocles, to which you
may reconcile yourself and languish in vain, shown in the falling melody after the
introduction to the first movement. As despair grows, there may be refuge in day-dreams,
suggested by the clarinet melody of the second subject, immediately followed by a shining
human image of joy. Reality and Fate intervene to shatter the illusion.
The second movement, Tchaikovsky suggests, shows the sad
weariness of evening, in which past happiness may be remembered and past trouble, a sense
of bitter sweetness, epitomized in the opening oboe melody. The Scherzo, with its plucked
strings, suggests fleeting images that hurry past, drunken peasants, a street song and a
distant band of soldiers passing. The last movement proposes an answer to depression in
the company of others and in their enjoyment. Fate is a reminder of subjective reality.
Melancholy can disappear in the happiness of others.
The Fourth Symphony
echoes to some extent the emotions that Tchajkovsky experienced at this most difficult
period of his life, however difficult he found it to express the ideas behind his music
verbally. It was criticized by some for what seemed a balletic element in the score, a
charge the composer rebutted indignantly. Nevertheless it won general popular favour and
made an excellent impression abroad that served to spread Tchaikovsky's reputation.
The Polish National Radio Symphony Orchestra of Katowice
(PNRSO)
The Polish Radio National Symphony Orchestra of Katowice
(PRNSO) was founded in 1945, soon after the end of the World War II, by the eminent Polish
conductor Witold Rowicki. The PRNSO replaced the Polish Radio Symphony Orchestra which had
existed from 1934 to 1939 in Warsaw, under the direction of another outstanding artist,
Grzegorz Fitelberg. In 1947 Grzegroz Fitelberg returned to Poland and became artistic
director of the PRNSO. He was followed by a series of distinguished Polish conductors -
Jan Krenz, Bohdan Wodiezko, Kazimierz Kord, Tadeusz Strugala, Jerzy, Maksymiuk, Stanislaw
Wislocki and, since 1983, Antoni Wit. The orchestra has appeared with conductors and
soloists of the greatest distinction and bas recorded for Polskie Nagrania and many
international record labels.
Adrian Leaper
Adrian Leaper was appointed Assistant Conductor to Stanislaw
Skrowaczewski of the Halle Orchestra in 1986, and has since then enjoyed an increasingly
busy career, with engagements at home and throughout Europe. Born in 1953, Adrian Leaper
studied at the Royal Academy of Music and was for a number of years co-principal French
horn in the Philharmonia Orchestra, before turning his attention exclusively to
conducting. He has been closely involved with the Naxos and Marco Polo labels and has been
consequently instrumental in introducing elements of English repertoire to Eastern Europe.
His numerous recordings include a complete cycle of Sibelius symphonies for Naxos.