Étienne-Nicolas Mehul (1763-1817) Symphony No. 1 in G Minor Allegro Andante Menuet Finale: Allegro agitato Symphony No. 2 in D Major Adagio - Allegro...
Étienne-Nicolas Mehul (1763-1817)
Symphony No. 1 in G Minor
Allegro
Andante
Menuet
Finale: Allegro agitato
Symphony No. 2 in D Major
Adagio - Allegro
Andante
Menuet: Allegro
Finale: Allegro vivace
Étienne-Nicolas Mehul must be reckoned one
of the more important contemporaries of Beethoven, his death at least regretted
by the latter, who had in earlier correspondence asked for examples of his work
and had been clearly influenced by him in the opera Fidelio. During the
course of a busy career in Paris he wrote a large number of stage works, to
which his surviving symphonies, a significant achievement in themselves, form a
brief postscript.
Mehul was born in Givet in 1763, the son
of the chief butler of the Count of Montmorency, who later set himself up in business,
like Beethoven's grandfather, as a wine-merchant. He started his musical
training, as so many French musicians had, as an organist at the Franciscan
convent in Givet, later studying under and becoming assistant to the organist
of the Abbey of Lavaldieu in the Ardennes, Wilhelm Hanser, a German musician
borrowed from the Premonstratensians of Schussenried by the abbot.
By 1779 Mehul had moved to Paris, where
he took lessons from the Strasbourg composer and harpsichordist Jean-Frederic
Edelmann and may have supported himself as an organist, although there is no
direct evidence of this. Certainly in the 1780s he published two volumes of
keyboard sonatas, the second in the manner of the period with an optional
violin part, and was known as a teacher. It was in 1790 that he won his first
success in the theatre with the opera-comique Euphrosine, which
contained one duet that won immediate popularity. In spite of the disturbed
political situation of the time, he continued to write a series of works for
the theatre, principally opera-comique, in which he was able to explore new
techniques in harmony and orchestration.
The establishment of the Institut National
de Musique.in 1793, originally an appendage of the National Guard, led to the
employment of Mehul on the teaching staff. After the amalgamation with Gossec's
École Royale de Chant this became, in 1795, the Conservatoire, an
institution briefly suppressed under the Bourbon restoration but re-established
in 1816. Mehul's employment in the new Institute involved him more directly in
politics and in the provision of music for the republic such as the Hymne ŕ la
raison of 1793 and a subsequent series of choral works and songs designed in
one way or another to celebrate the revolution and its Napoleonic consequences.
One such composition, the Chant national du 14 juillet 1800, was commissioned
by Napoleon after the battle of Marengo, and in scale prefigures the Requiem
that Berlioz was to write in 1837 for performance in the same building, Les
Invalides.
Mehul's work for the theatre was to
continue with success varying as taste veered towards the Italian. His biblical
opera of 1807, Joseph, was to remain in the repertoire throughout the
nineteenth century. Les Amazones, four years later, was a failure at the
Opera, while Lajournee aux aventures of 1816 again succeeded at the
Opera-Comique. Mehul, like his contemporary and rival Le Sueur, who was to
relate to his pupil Berlioz tales of the former's enmity, helped to extend the
subject matter of opera. He was responsible for adventurous changes in
orchestration and may be regarded as a pioneer in the use of the Leitmotif.
<>The operatic Overtures are evidence of
Mehul's ability in handling symphonic form and the purely orchestral work. The
first three of the five numbered symphonies appeared in 1809, followed by a
fourth and fifth the next year, the last incomplete and unperformed. The
influence of Haydn is apparent in the first
and second symphonies.
Symphony No. 1 in G minor opens in fine French
style with splendidly dramatic contrast between first and second subjects. The
slow movement is an Andante in free variation form, followed by a plucked
string Minuet and a Trio that has been compared to a German Laendler, with an
exciting Finale, in which Schumann detected similarities with the first
movement of Beethoven's
Fifth Symphony. Mendelssohn's admiration for the
work suggests the possiblity of influence on that composer.
Symphony
No. 2 in D major starts with a slow introduction that may remind a listener
again of Beethoven. The Allegro unfolds with a second subject clearly derived
from the first. The slow movement is a B minor Andante, with contrapuntal
touches that belie the accusations sometimes levelled at the composer. The use
of the timpani in the final movement has again been compared to Beethoven's use
of the instrument in his Violin Concerto. It opens with drum and double
bass providing an ostinato from which the principal theme is derived to form a
model conclusion to a work that looks back to Haydn and forward to a new age.
The Rhenish Philharmonic Orchestra
The Rhenish
Philharmonic Orchestra was established in 1945 as the symphony orchestra of
Radio Coblenz, and the following year became the orchestra of the newly
re-opened Coblenz Opera. In 1973 it became the official orchestra of the State
of Rhineland-Pfalz.
The orchestra has undertaken a number of
tours in Germany, to Salzburg, and to Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Spain
and Switzerland.
Some 25 records have been made and there
have been frequent appearances on radio and television.
Musicians who
have worked with the Rhenish Philharmonic Orchestra include Aram Khatchaturian,
Eugen Jochum, Gunther Wand, Carlo Zecchi, Salvatore Accardo, Christoph
Eschenbach, Henryk Szeryng, Wanda Wilkomirska and Alexis Weissenberg. Since
1981 the Principal Conductor has been the Scottish musician James Lockhart.