Louis Spohr (1784-1859)
Quartet No.20 in A Minor, Op. 74, No.1 (August, 1826)
Quartet No.21 in B-flat Major, Op. 74, No.2 (November, 1826)
The composition of string quartets ran as a continuous
thread throughout Spohr's life. He wrote his first, opus 4, at about the age of
twenty, and more than fifty years later his last completed large-scale work was
his thirty-sixth string quartet, WoO. 42. This varied body of works constitutes
a significant contribution to the quartet literature of the first half of the
nineteenth century; it contains abundant examples of the harmonic and melodic
features and the experiments in form and metre that fascinated his
contemporaries.
At the time of Spohr's birth in 1784, Haydn's innovative
opus 33 quartets had been published for only two years, and Mozart, inspired by
their masterly handling of the medium, was still working on his six quartets
dedicated to Haydn. Over the next few years Mozart produced his last quartets,
while Haydn rose to new heights in the series of works that began with opus 50
in 1787, and in 1801 Beethoven published his six opus 18 quartets. During
Spohr's formative years as student and Kammermusicus in Brunswick, he came to
know and love this repertoire of chamber music, which he played, along with works
by lesser contemporaries, at frequent quartet parties. It was to have a lasting
impression on his own approach to quartet writing. His devotion to Mozart, in
particular, was to remain intense throughout his life, and he retained a lively
admiration for Haydn. Despite his often quoted criticisms of Beethoven's later
works he was, in fact, among the earliest champions of the opus 18 quartets in
northern Germany and performed them within a very short time of their
publication; indeed, on his concert tour of 1804 his advocacy of these quartets
put him at odds with some notable musicians. In Berlin the celebrated cellist
and composer Bernhard Romberg, after complimenting him on his performance of
one of them, remarked disparagingly, "But my dear Spohr, how can you bear
to play such absurd stuff?"
Spohr's activity as a virtuoso violinist, however, also
brought him into direct contact with a radically different kind of quartet
which was profoundly to influence his approach to the medium: this was the
so-called quatuor brilliant or Solo-Quartett. Since the piano was not yet the
universal accompaniment instrument it later became, many violinist-composers
wrote pieces with accompaniment to provide them with a repertoire in which they
displayed their technical brilliance at soirées and other occasions when an
orchestra was not available. The quatuor brilliant, a kind of chamber concerto,
was a natural outcome of this. During Spohr's early concert tours, when
Beethoven's quartets failed to interest his audience, he could always count on
rousing their enthusiasm with a performance of the Quartet in E flat major,
opus 11 (1804), by the much admired French violinist Pierre Rode, which, though
not published with the title quatuor brilliant, was an important precursor of the
genre.
The influence both of the Viennese classics and of virtuoso
violin music is clearly evident in Spohr's own works for string quartet. The
virtuoso tradition is emphasized in two potpourris and two sets of variations
with string trio accompaniment, composed during the years 1804 to 1808, and in
his eight virtuoso quartets, written between 1806 and 1835. His first quatuor
brilliant, opus 11, which he described in a letter to his publisher, Kühnel, as
"of the Rode type" was followed by five more which were published
with the same title. These are in three movements, without a minuet or scherzo,
after the pattern of Rode's prototypes. A seventh, opus 30, was similarly
designated on the autograph score despite its four movements, and opus 27 too,
though it was published as Grand quatuor, is in the same tradition, being
referred to in Spohr's autobiography as a Solo-Quartett. But Spohr clearly recognised
the essential difference between the Solo-Quartett and the "true"
quartet, and in his other twenty-eight quartets the emphasis is on dialogue
among the instruments. Though difficult, even virtuoso, passages are often
given to the first violin and sometimes to the other instruments, these are skilfully
integrated into the general design so that the main focus is on a
conversational working out of motifs. For Spohr technical brilliance was always
at the service of loftier musical aims, and, on the whole, his quartets achieve
a notably successful synthesis of the classical and virtuosic polarities in his
musical nature.
Clive Brown
[Clive Brown is an internationally recognized authority on
the music of Spohr and the author of Louis Spohr: A Critical Biography.
Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, 1984.]
Spohr's oratorio, The Last Judgement, had been astoundingly
successful at the Rhenish Music Festival at Düsseldorf in May of 1826 - so much
so that the festival had to be extended for an entire day so that The Last
Judgement could be repeated for the enthusiastic public. Spohr was now an
acknowledged master of vocal music as well as instrumental but, during the
latter half of the same year, in the rosy afterglow of all the adulation and
prestige accorded him as a result of the success of The Last Judgement, he
returned to the world of chamber music, composing a number of chamber works,
including the Op. 74 string quartets, in Kassel. It may appear to have
been an abrupt volte face for Spohr to follow the universal proclamations of The
Last Judgement with the personal intimacy of chamber music, especially as
he had not written any for at least three years. But Spohr had been successful
with chamber music long before The Last Judgement: chamber music was
familiar territory to him as a composer and he was intimate with it as a
performer as a number of his previous chamber works, especially the string
quartets, were written with concertante roles to feature his own virtuosity as
one of the leading violinists of his day. In April, 1826, he composed the String
Quintet in B Minor, Op. 69 and began the Six Songs for Voice and Piano,
Op. 72 in July, putting them aside in August to complete the first quartet
of Op. 74. The first movement of this quartet is an allegro vivace with
a terse motive from its dramatic first theme pervading the entire movement,
even forming part of the accompaniment to the lyrical second subject. The
development plays off rhythmic elements of both the exposition's main themes
while an orthodox recapitulation sets up the coda for more exploration of the
movement's opening motive. The movement, unexpectedly and almost humorously,
ends rather quietly. The larghetto con moto, in the key of F major, is
92 bars of gentle song after which the scherzo returns to the key of A
minor with a rising theme punctuated at occasional intervals with reminiscences
of the terse motive which began the first movement. The trio of the scherzo shifts
to the tonic major key. The final rondo is an allegretto in A
major, the main theme of which is a perky affair with a dotted rhythm to liven
it up. The episodes provide considerable musical interest of their own and the
coda, rather than building to a climax, stretches out and relaxes comfortably
in the tonic major key - Spohr at his most amiable!
Spohr completed the remaining songs of Op. 72 in
September and October of 1826 and returned to the composition of string
quartets the following month when he completed the second quartet in the Op.
74 trilogy. Right from the opening measures, it is evident that Op. 74,
No. 2 is a more light-hearted affair than its predecessor although it is
not without its moments of pathos, especially in the fine second movement larghetto.
The opening theme of the first movement is a triple-meter derivation of the
jovial tune from the final rondo (allegretto) of Beethoven's Piano
Sonata No. 11, Op. 22 - which is also in B-flat major. Beethoven's Op.
22 was composed 26 years before Spohr's Op. 74 string quartets but
it was obviously a work Spohr admired as the spirit of its rondo theme pervades
the entire first movement of Op. 74, No. 2. The second theme
grows out of the first, providing a high degree of thematic integration in a
movement which is a virtual textbook example of sonata form. The soulful larghetto
is in G minor and plumbs depths of feeling which no other single movement
of Op. 74 attains. What compositional innovation there is evident in
this quartet is perhaps due to the fact that there is no scherzo or minuet: the
third movement is a pleasant allegretto con variazioni (based on an
original theme by Spohr) and the finale allegretto begins, unusually, in
B-flat minor and minor key sonorities prevail throughout most of the movement.
However, near the end, it shifts to the tonic major and briefly attempts to
cadence in a more boisterous fashion. Apparently, however, Spohr was in a
reflective mood in the autumn of 1826: in the brief ensuing coda, the movement
ends quietly and meditatively - albeit remaining in the tonic major.
Robert Jordan
Spohr Society of Great Britain
New Budapest Quartet
András Kiss, 1st Violin
Ferenc Balogh, 2nd Violin
Lászlo Bársony, Viola
Károly Botvay, Violoncello
The New Budapest Quartet was formed in 1971 and in the same
year won third prize at the Haydn International Competition in Vienna and
second prize at the Carlo Jachino International Competition in Rome. The
following year the quartet worked under the famous Hungarian String Quartet at
the last of its summer courses and was hailed by critics as its successor.
Since then the New Budapest Quartet has toured extensively throughout Eastern
and Western Europe and in the Americas.