Spohr: String Quartets Vol. 11
$9.99
(COMPACT DISC)
This item is currently out of stock.
Just copy this code and paste it where you want the link on your website:
Louis Spohr (1784-1859) Quartet No. 32 in C major, Op. 141 (February 1849) Quartet No. 34 in E flat major, Op. 152 (June-July 1855) The composition of...
Louis Spohr (1784-1859)
Quartet No. 32 in C major, Op. 141 (February 1849)
Quartet No. 34 in E flat major, Op. 152 (June-July 1855)
The composition of string quartets ran as a continuous
thread throughout Spohr's life. He wrote his first, Op. 4,
at about the age of twenty, and more than fifty years
later his last completed large-scale work was his String
Quartet No. 36, Op. 157. This varied body of works
constitutes a significant contribution to the quartet
literature of the first half of the nineteenth century; it
contains abundant examples of the harmonic and
melodic features and the experiments in form and metre
that fascinated his contemporaries.
At the time of Spohr's birth in 1784, Haydn's
innovative Op. 33 quartets had been published for only
two years, and Mozart, inspired by their masterly
handling of the medium, was still working on his six
quartets dedicated to Haydn. Over the next few years
Mozart produced his last quartets, while Haydn rose to
new heights in the series of works that began with Op.
50 in 1787, and in 1801 Beethoven published his six
Op. 18 quartets. During Spohr's formative years as
student and Kammermusicus in Brunswick, he came to
know and love this repertoire of chamber music which
he played, along with works by lesser contemporaries,
at frequent quartet parties. It was to have a lasting
impression on his own approach to quartet writing. His
devotion to Mozart, in particular, was to remain intense
throughout his life, and he retained a lively admiration
for Haydn. Despite his often quoted criticisms of
Beethoven's later works he was, in fact, among the
earliest champions of the Op. 18 quartets in northern
Germany and performed them within a very short time
of their publication; indeed, on his concert tour of 1804
his advocacy of these quartets put him at odds with
some notable musicians. In Berlin the celebrated cellist
and composer Bernhard Romberg, after complimenting
him on his performance of one of them, remarked
disparagingly, 'But my dear Spohr, how can you bear to
play such absurd stuff?'
Spohr's activity as a virtuoso violinist, however,
also brought him into direct contact with a radically
different kind of quartet which was profoundly to
influence his approach to the medium: this was the socalled
Quatuor brillant or Solo-Quartett. Since the
piano was not yet the universal accompaniment
instrument it later became, many violinist-composers
wrote pieces with string accompaniment to provide
them with a repertoire in which they could display their
technical brilliance at soirees and other occasions when
an orchestra was not available. The Quatuor brillant, a
kind of chamber concerto, was a natural outcome of
this. During Spohr's early concert tours, when
Beethoven's quartets failed to interest his audience, he
could always count on rousing their enthusiasm with a
performance of the Quartet in E flat major, Op. 11
(1804) by the much admired French violinist Pierre
Rode, which, though not published with the title
quatuor brillant, was an important precursor of the
genre.
The influence both of the Viennese classics and of
virtuoso violin music is clearly evident in Spohr's own
works for string quartet. The virtuoso tradition is
emphasized in two potpourris and two sets of variations
with string trio accompaniment, composed during the
years 1804 to 1808, and in his eight virtuoso quartets,
written between 1806 and 1835. His first Quatuor
brillant, Op. 11, which he described in a letter to his
publisher, Kühnel, as 'of the Rode type', was followed
by five more which were published with the same title.
These are in three movements, without a minuet or
scherzo, after the pattern of Rode's prototypes. A
seventh, Op. 30, was similarly designated on the
autograph score despite its four movements, and Op. 27
too, though it was published as Grand quatuor, is in the
same tradition, being referred to in Spohr's
autobiography as a Solo-Quartett. But Spohr clearly
recognised the essential difference between the Solo-
Quartett and the 'true' quartet, and in his other 28
quartets the emphasis is on dialogue among the
instruments. Though difficult, even virtuoso, passages
are often given to the first violin and sometimes to the
other instruments, these are skilfully integrated into
the general design so that the main focus is on a
conversational working out of motifs. For Spohr
technical brilliance was always at the service of loftier
musical aims, and, on the whole, his quartets achieve a
notably successful synthesis of the classical and
virtuoso polarities in his musical nature.
Clive Brown
[Clive Brown is an internationally recognised authority
on the music of Spohr and the author of Louis Spohr: A
Critical Biography. Cambridge University Press, 1984.]
The Quartet No. 32 in C major, Op. 141, dates from
February 1849, Spohr's 27th year as Kapellmeister at
Kassel, and continues the mood of optimism which
found its outlet in his String Sextet, Op. 140 (also in
C major), written in March-April 1848 at the time of the
revolution which Spohr openly supported. The warm
and sinuous expansive opening theme of the quartet,
with its rich harmonies, points ahead to Brahms and the
mood of well-being extends throughout this Allegro
moderato. In the substantial development Spohr
concentrates on an important staccato linking motif
along with the markedly melodic second subject. The
movement closes with a version of the main theme
overlaid with what Hans Glenewinkel, in his 1912 study
of Spohr's quartets, calls 'interwoven figures
resembling the silvery threads of a spider's web'.
Gentle, serene emotion dominates the F major
Larghetto which features many delicate details. Semiquaver
triplets provide a contrast but do not greatly
disturb the overall peaceful progress of the movement.
The C minor Scherzo, in the rhythm of a Spanish bolero,
disrupts the warm-hearted flow of the earlier
movements. The forceful main motif is always
interrupted by chromaticisms which cast over the
Scherzo an atmosphere of deep melancholy. The Trio in
A flat major is a more relaxed etude for the first violin.
After repeats of the Scherzo and Trio, the melancholy
material completely dominates the short coda. The
mood of the Scherzo is immediately thrown off by the
carefree Presto finale. The three notes which open the
movement successively in each of the four instruments
are used to generate many components of the finale.
They launch the piquant second subject whose flow is
suddenly slowed down in its seventh bar and is marked
to be played 'always pianissimo' for 27 bars. This
lengthy pianissimo is also featured in the development
which then introduces a fugato above the main theme.
The work ends confidently with emphatic chords.
By 1850 the revolution had been suppressed.
Prussian and Bavarian troops arrived in Kassel to
enforce martial law and in letters to friends at the time
the composer made no attempt to hide his depression at
this turn of events. 'If I were not too old I would now
emigrate to the free country of America", he said.
By the time Spohr wrote his Quartet No. 34 in E flat
major, Op. 152, in June and July 1855, the crackdown
had proved brutally effective and the ruling Prince was
running his state in his old authoritarian way. The
quartet carries an undertow of sadness and Spohr sets
the mood right at the start by prefacing the first
movement with a pensive and questioning slow
introduction. The opening four-note figure plays a
major rôle in the progress of the whole movement as it
provides the launching pad for both first and second
subjects. It at one stage displays an audacity
unprecedented in Spohr where, over syncopations in the
cello, a jarring dissonance remains unresolved. This
feature returns in the same form in the Allegro in which
Spohr replaces a conventional development with a
fugato. Syncopation is an important unsettling factor
right up to the last bars. In the A flat major Larghetto
con moto the composer is unable to shake off the
atmosphere of melancholy and syncopations also
invade the sweetly lyrical opening theme. Complex
inner chromaticisms prevent the music from soaring
free above care in the contrasting section dominated by
sextuplet figures. The Menuetto in E flat major provides
a strong contrast in which the opening dotted rocking
accompanying motif contends with the main theme for
melodic prominence to produce a bizarrely restless yet
attractive effect. The Trio in A flat major is notable for a
folksong-like melody which the first violin has to
execute mainly in testing double-stops. This theme
returns briefly to end the movement. The finale finds a
lighter, even frivolous, tone and the second subject, a
variant of the first, includes some neat interplay
between the two violinists (varied to first violin and
viola in the recapitulation). The first subject starts the
development but Spohr then springs a surprise - a
completely new theme begins a fugato under which the
cello eventually repeats the first four notes of the
opening motif. After the recapitulation there is a brief
reference to the fugato material along with the cello's
four-note signal and the quartet concludes with a
diminuendo to a minor key plagal cadence. Spohr has
found that frivolity cannot prevail and the mood of the
times cannot be so easily overcome.
Keith Warsop
Chairman, Spohr Society of Great Britain
String Quartet No. 32 in C major, Op. 141 (more info)
-
I. Allegro moderato - 11:20
-
II. Larghetto - 8:57
-
III. Scherzo (Allegro) - 5:31
-
IV. Finale (Presto) - 8:42
String Quartet No. 34 in E flat major, Op. 152 (more info)
-
I. Adagio - Allegro - 9:29
-
II. Larghetto con moto - 5:27
-
III. Menuetto - 7:46
-
IV. Finale (Allegro) - 8:53