Aram Il'yich Khachaturian (1903 - 1978) Spartacus - Adagio of Spartacus and Phrygia Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky (1840 - 1893) Suite No.1 in D Major, Op. 43...
Aram Il'yich Khachaturian (1903 - 1978)
Spartacus - Adagio of Spartacus and Phrygia
Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky (1840 - 1893)
Suite No.1 in D Major, Op. 43
Marche Slave, Op. 31
1812 Overture, Op. 49
While exercising firm political control over the diverse regions of its vast
empire, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics also followed a policy of
encouraging arts that had their source in the culture of the people, harnessed
to the ends of Socialist Realism. In spite of occasional brushes with the
authorities, the music of Aram Khachaturian remained firmly rooted in the
cultural traditions of Armenia and of the Caucasus. Born in Thilisi in 1903 and
of Armenian extraction, he enjoyed earlier study, from the age of nineteen, at
the Gnesin Institute, followed, seven years later, by entry to the Moscow
Conservatory, where his composition teacher was Miaskovsky in a protracted
course of study that continued until 1937. He had by this time won very wide
acclaim for his Piano Concerto and first symphony celebrating the
fifteenth anniversary of the foundation of the Soviet Armenian Republic. A
specifically Armenian element remained of importance in his work, although there
were occasions when, under the pressure of official condemnation, he excused
perceived tendencies to formalism by claiming that critics had urged him to
avoid what might have appeared a national limitation to his reputation and
creativity. In 1948, together with Shostakovich, Prokofiev and others, he was
criticized for deviation from the proper path for Soviet music. He had no need
to take this official disapproval too seriously. Essentially his music had
proved satisfactory in its use of Armenian material and in its popular appeal:
formalism was not a charge that could be proved against him.
The Great Patriotic War had provided Khachaturian with an opportunity to
prove his loyalty to the principles of communism chiefly in his ballet Gayane
and a second symphony. It was the third symphony, a symphonic poem in garish
celebration of victory, that misfired, to earn Zhdanov's official censure.
Thereafter Khachaturian turned his immediate attention to film-scores,
disregarding Khrennikov's warning that this was not to be used as a means of
escape from justified Soviet criticism. After the death of Stalin in 1953, he
was able to speak openly in favour of greater freedom for artists. His plea was
controversial, condemning, as it did, the official direction of composition
practised under Stalin in recent years and the resulting mediocrity. It was in
the years immediately following that he won some success with his score for the
ballet Spartacus, based on the exploits of a hero who had appealed to
Karl Marx as representative of the proletariat of the ancient Roman world. The
score was awarded a Lenin Prize in 1959, but proved more generally acceptable on
the stage in a revised version of 1968.
Khachaturian's career after the war was, after 1953, generally successful. He
exploited his gifts as a conductor, particularly of his own compositions, and
continued to write music that was imbued with the spirit of Armenia that he had
inherited by birth, so that this element in his work becomes more than mere
superficial exoticism. Whatever views he may have been compelled to express on
"technicism" in the Composers' Union meetings of 1948, he possessed a
technical command of musical resources, deft in orchestration and felicitous in
melodic invention and in the use of melodies of ethnic origin. He continued
composing even into his final years, during which he wrote unaccompanied sonatas
for cello, for violin and for viola, completing the last of these in 1977, the
year before his death.
Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky was born in 1840, the second son by his second wife
of a mining engineer, manager of a metal works. At home he showed musical
precocity and in 1848 he had his first experience of school in St. Petersburg.
Two years later he entered the School of Jurisprudence, where he remained for
nine years, later entering the government service. In 1863 he resigned from his
position in the Ministry of Justice and became a student at the newly
established Conservatory in St. Petersburg, following this with appointment to
the staff of the new Conservatory in Moscow. He remained on the staff of the
Moscow Conservatory until 1878, when a pension from a rich widow, with whom he
corresponded for years but whom he never met, gave him independence to continue
a career as a composer. He died when he seemed at the height of his powers, in
1893.
This bald account of the course of Tchaikovsky's life ignores aspects that
caused him a great deal of misery. The departure of his beloved governess in
1848 and the death of his mother in 1854 moved him deeply, affecting a nature
that had already proved morbidly sensitive and diffident. Tchaikovsky was well
enough liked by his contemporaries at the School of Jurisprudence and was never
one to withdraw from social contact. Nevertheless, as a musician, he was easily
depressed by harsh criticism and remained intensely critical of what he wrote.
In 1868 Tchaikovsky had written a symphonic poem Fatum and this had
elicited from Balakirev, in St. Petersburg, harsh and detailed criticism.
Balakirev was the leader of the group of nationalist composers, Rimsky-Korsakov,
Cesar Cui, Borodin and Mussorgsky. He had taken over the direction of the
Russian Music Society concerts in St. Petersburg after the resignation of their
founder, Anton Rubinstein in 1867. In 1869 he was dismissed by the Grand Duchess
Elena Pavlovna, and Tchaikovsky gallantly published an article deploring this.
Tchaikovsky's defence of Balakirev and his ready acceptance of the criticism of Fatum
led to the renewal of Balakirev's influence over him, and it was from him
that the idea of writing an orchestral work on the subject of Shakespeare's Romeo
and Juliet came. Balakirev was always ready to offer criticism of the music
of his contemporaries, but was equally generous with ideas.
In the aftermath of his marriage Tchaikovsky had taken refuge abroad in the
autumn of 1877. The following year he was again in Russia, resolved to leave the
Conservatory, not least because of hints in the press about his private life. In
May he was at the estate of Nadezhda von Meck, where he returned in August,
busying himself with the composition of a suite, allegedly in the style of Franz
Lachner, a contemporary and friend of Schubert in Vienna, a composition on which
he continued to work at his brother-in-law Lev Davidov's Verbovka estate. Later
progress on the suite was interrupted, to be continued abroad, in Florence,
where his patroness had provided an apartment for his use. The suite underwent
various changes, before it took its final shape. Tchaikovsky had second thoughts
about the prevalence of duple rhythm throughout, and then about the number of
movements. Eventually it assumed its present form, with a first movement an Introduction
and Fugue, followed by a B flat major Divertimento, opened by
the solo clarinet. The third movement Intermezzo, in D minor, has a
melody for violin, flute and bassoon based on the ascending scale. This is
followed by a miniature March, originally described by the composer as March
of the Lilliputians, a movement he attempted to withdraw, until persuaded to
retain it. The suite continues with a Scherzo and a final Gavotte. In
the whole work and the chosen form he had enjoyed a freedom that the symphony
would not allow, finding himself able to write the kind of music that found
further expression in his ballets. Ironically the most popular of all the
movements, both at its first performances in Russia and subsequently, has been
the March that Tchaikovsky had once hoped to discard.
About the 1812 Overture Tchaikovsky was diffident, describing it, in a
letter to his patroness Nadezhda von Meck, as "without any serious
merits". The overture was written in response to an official commission
from Nikolay Rubinstein and was to celebrate the opening of the Cathedral of
Christ the Saviour, an event timed to coincide with the Moscow Exhibition of
Industry and the Arts and the silver jubilee of the Tsar.
Since the building of the Cathedral was designed to commemorate the events of
1812, when the armies of Napoleon had been forced to retreat from Moscow,
Tchaikovsky chose to make his overture a graphic description of the conflict,
with the French represented by the Marseillaise and Russia by an Orthodox chant
and a folk-song, and, in final victory, by "God save the Tsar". The
piece, therefore, aptly honoured a royal occasion as well as a religious and
patriotic one. The inclusion of cannon in the scoring has made the overture a
popular spectacle.
The Marche Slave, Opus 31, was completed early in October 1876, in
response to a request from Nikolay Rubinstein for a work to be played at a
Moscow concert in aid of victims of the Turks in the Balkans, where Montenegro
and Serbia had declared war against Turkey, and Russian pro-slav feelings were
running high.
The original title of the work was the Serbo-Russian March, and
Tchaikovsky used in it fragments of three Serbian melodies, with a reference to
the Russian Imperial anthem before the re-appearance of material of the opening
in a final, third section. The anthem appears in fuller form at the climax of a
march that was well calculated to appeal to the patriotic emotions of the day.