Pierre Boulez (b. 1925)
Piano Sonatas
Pierre Boulez occupies a unique position in French music,
distinguished internationally as a composer, a conductor and a theorist. A
pupil of Messiaen at the Paris Conservatoire, he turned to the serialism of Schoenberg.
His reputation was first established in 1948 by the second of his three piano
sonatas, first performed by Yvonne Loriod at Oarmstadt and followed by the
Livre pour quatuor, which, like certain later
works, allows the players some freedom of choice and suggested the total serialism
of compositions that immediately followed. His importance in twentieth century
music was further emphasised by the remarkable Le marteau sans maitre in
the 1950s and by Pli selon pli, with its flexibility of structure. Boulezremains
one of the most important and influential composers and teachers in
contemporary terms, an achievement parallelled by his work as a conductor,
atone time with both the BBCsymphony and the New York Philharmonic Orchestras,
where he is known for his clarity of interpretation and his imaginative
understanding of the music he directs.
Keith Anderson
The three piano sonatas of Pierre Boulez occupy an
important position in piano literature of the twentieth century .The
instrument, in fact, has not been central to the work of the majority of
composers of the century as it was to those of the nineteenth. The thirty-two
sonatas of Beethoven were for long a constraining factor. Composers of the
first half of the twentieth century tried to escape from this. Generally
speaking, major composers of the second half of the century have not composed
any more for the piano, but some of them have more easily opted for the
instrumental genre of the sonata. Since 1945 the model of Beethoven has been a solid
point of reference for composers who have turned to the form in the perspective
of a reconstruction of musical language.
Composed in 1946, the First Sonata of Pierre
Boulez is in two movements, a slow followed bya fast. In the first four bars of
the work the composer presents five characteristic and very different figures,
easily distinguishable by the listener. These will serve as the basic material
of the first movement: a simple and calm interval, a low note with an
appoggiatura, a single note in the highest register, a rapid and impetuous
figure leading to a deep stressed note, a broadly spreading polyphonic chord,
low and high in register. The work of the composer has consisted in taking
these elements and varying the parameters that define them. The rapid figure thus
reappears at bar 14, always descending, but its character is different, since
it decreases in dynamic to a note played pianissimo.
In the whole movement a great variety of length and of
meaning of silences can be noticed, with the use of the entire range of the
keyboard and sudden changes of dynamics, together with the multiplicity of
figures dealt with. These characteristics are found in the second movement of
the sonata. This is a vast "toccata", constructed from rapid figures,
alternating between the two hands -figures that may have rounded outline with
an intimate fusion of voices. In this
early composition there are already evident some of the
elements that will define the compositional style of Pierre Boulez: clarity and
rigour of expression, and a tendency to brilliant outbursts.
The Second Sonata was written two years later. It
is a more extended and ambitious work, organized in four movements, three fast
and one slow .From the first bars all the differences that distinguish this
sonata from the first are apparent. Silences take up a suitable part of the
taut discourse, full of musical statements, often connected, a new feature, by
trills and demanding
the sustained attention of the listener. Here the
Beethoven sonata ideal is realised. Taken in isolation, a movement no longer
only has value in its relationship with other movements; the riches this
movement contains mark it also as a complete work in itself, a model of the
whole. This said, the second movement is more economic in measurable musical
statements - it is the traditional sonata slow movement. Its completeness is no
less definite. Here anew element is apparent in comparison with the first
sonata: the building up of a certain dramatic character, a progress of
discourse towards a tension to be resolved, something that two years before the
composer had avoided. The third movement -a true scherzo -is not without
reference to the malleability found in the second: some scattered elements,
stated fragmentarily, are brought gradually together in a fusion of great
complexity. Although there are connections with the feverish first movement,
the fourth is still more complex in that it is the definite ending of the work
and brings together and concentrates in itself the different paths marked out
in the preceding movements. Frequent directions, associated with the sudden and
continual changes of mood, indicate the richness of this integrated
movement." Very fine shades in a grey painting" and pulverise the
sound are two, among others, nearly in the manner of Debussy, that speak of
the poetic ambition that is here at work.
Written between 1957 and 1958, the Third Sonata is
a work that has given rise to a number of commentaries. Its plan has been
described by the composer himself in a famous theoretical article. As the
ambition ofPierre Boulezwas to take into consideration the researches of
certain writers in form -principally the idea of the Livre formulated by
Mallarme in 1885 -a great many commentators have gone one better than the
literary tenor of the plan, interesting in itself but bearing little of
relevance to the listener.
The Third Sonata of Pierre Boulez was conceived at
a time when composers were questioning the idea of the freedom of the
interpreter, after a historical phase, called post-serial, which had laid down,
even in its smallest details, the different parameters of musical
interpretation. The Third Sonata reacts against the tyranny of the
composer and opens certain doors, but, happily it can be said, closes others.
The freedom that is given to the interpreter in this work
concerns the order of movements and the internal arrangement of dialogue within
each of the movements. That is all. This freedom is not audible to the
listener, to whom, in general, two different and successive interpretations are
not offered. The opening of the work -reacting against the tradition of a fixed
order that affects the idea itself of the score - is found again strangely in
the fact that the Third
Sonata, which is always described as in five
movements (or formative elements) by the composer and his commentators, has in
fact only two published movements - Trope and Constellation (or Constellation-miroir).
The others exist, but are to be revised. The work is therefore always open, in
the sense that it is always still in process of composition.
The opening is reduced, if one follows what has been
published. Theoretically there are eight possibilities of reading the order of
the formative elements. Since the published score consists simply of two
elements, the choices are reduced to two: Trope can be played before Constellation
or after Constellation-miroir, which is the double reflection of
Constellation, when the order of reading is reversed.
Musically Constellation (or Constellation-miroir)
is a passage marked with arrows that connects the Points sections
(figured in green) and the Blocs sections (figured in red). This unlinear
passage which makes of the score a real navigation map nevertheless excludes primary
simplifications: Blocs and Points are to be understood as
tendencies respectively towards vertical chords and to horizontal lines and are
susceptible to mixture between the two.
Trope offers another kind of beginning. The score
is a spirally bound book that can be opened wherever one likes but must be played
to the end wherever one starts and whatever the direction chosen. In the two
formative elements the musical material is more rarefied than in the second
sonata. The discourse proceeds always in bursts of sound but the composer has preferred
sustained notes, resonances, in short, introspection.
Dominique Druhen
(English version by Keith Anderson)