Edvard
Grieg (1843 -1907)
Piano
Music Vol.14
Edvard Grieg was born in
Bergen, on the west coast of Norway, in 1843. He showed a
strong interest in music at a very early age, and after encouragement from the
violinist and composer Ole Bull (1810 -1880) was sent to the Conservatory in Leipzig at the age of fifteen
to receive his musical education. There he had fundamental and solid musical
training, and through the city's flourishing musical life, received impressions
and heard music which would come to leave its stamp on him for the rest of his
life - for better or for worse. Even though he severely criticized the Leipzig
Conservatory, especially towards the end of his life, in reality his
exceptional gifts were recognised, and one sees in his sketchbooks of the Leipzig period that he had the
freedom to experiment as well. He had no good reason to criticize the
conservatory, nor his teachers, for poor teaching or a lack of understanding.
From Leipzig Grieg
travelled to Copenhagen, bringing with him the
solid musical training he had acquired, and there soon became known as a
promising young composer. It was not long before he carne under the influence
of Rikard Nordraak, whose glowing enthusiasm and unshakeable belief that the
key to a successful future for Norwegian music lay in nationalism, in the
uniquely Norwegian, the music of the people - folk-songs - came to play a
decisive role in Grieg's development as a composer. Nordraak's influence is
most obvious in the Humoresques for piano, Op. 6, which was considered a
turning-point in Grieg's career as a composer.
In the autumn of 1866,
Grieg settled in Christiania (Oslo).
In 1874 Norway's capital was the
centre for his activities. During this time he also wrote the majority of the
works which laid the foundation for his steadily increasing fame. In spite of
his poor health -he had had a defective lung ever since childhood -he was
constantly on concert-tour as a pianist or as a conductor, always with his own
works on the programme. After his last concert-tour in 1907, he wrote to his
friend Frants Beyer:
This Tour has been
strange. The Audiences have been on my Side. In Germany I have received more ac
claim for my ART than ever before. But the Critics both in Munich and in Berlin have let me know in no
uncertain terms, that they think I am a dead Man. That is my punishment for
my lack of Productivity in these last Years, which my wretched physical
condition has caused. It is a hard and undeserved Punishment -but I
comfort myself with the thought that it is not the Critics, who govern the
world. (Letter to Frants Beyer, 5th March, 1907)
More clearly than
anything else, this letter shows a trend which Grieg experienced in his later
years in relation to his music. It was also a development which would continue
internationally until long after his death. Within the musical
"establishment", there were increasing numbers of people who were
gradually becoming more critical of Grieg's music and of his abilities and
talent as a composer. In the meantime his popularity among music-loving
audiences increased in inverse proportion. Grieg enjoyed some of his greatest
popularity with the general public during the last years of his life, when, in
spite of his greatly weakened health, he was continually on tour, in popular demand
from concert-managers all over the world. The critics, however, were sceptical
and condescending, and there is no doubt that Grieg felt hurt by their
attitude:
I cannot be blamed if my
music is played in third-rate hotels and by school-girls. I could not have
created my music any other way, even though I did not have my audience in mind
at the time. I guess this popularity is all right, hut it is dearly bought. My reputation
as a composer is suffering because of it, and the criticism is disparaging.'
From early on Grieg was labelled
a composer of small forms. His indisputable lyrical ability and talent were
never doubted, but apart from some very few works such as the Piano Concerto
in A minor, Op. 16, and the String Quartet in G minor,
Op. 27, the Piano Sonata in E minor, Op. 7, the
three Violin Sonatas, Op. 8 in F major, Op. 13 in
G major and Op. 45 in C minor, and the Cello
Sonata in A minor, Op. 36, he was not able, in spite of his many
desperate attempts to do so, to feel completely at home with more extended
ihUSicil:1 forms. He felt that this was a short-coming, and unfairly blamed his
education at the Leipzig Conservatory. Nevertheless, he also showed that he
could master these f6rMs when on rare occasions he found raw musical material
that could be reworked and treated within the traditional structure of
sonata-form. The only problem was that the musical material to which he felt
closest and that most fascinated him, was of another quality and character.
Grieg's encounter with
Norwegian folk-music, and his assimilation of essential features from this
music, released certain aspects of his own creativity that soon led to his
music being, for many, identified with folk-music. By some he was considered
more or less simply an arranger of folk-music, and that hurt him very deeply:
In my Op. 17 and Op. 66, I have
arranged folk-songs for the piano, in Op. 30, I have freely rendered
folk-ballads for the male voice. In three or four of my remaining works, I have
attempted to use Norwegian songs thematically. And since I have published up to
seventy works by now, I should be allowed to say that nothing is more incorrect
than the claim from German critics that my so-called originality is limited to
my borrowing from folk-music. It is quite another thing if a nationalistic
spirit, which has been expressed through folk-music since ancient times, hovers
over my original creative works.'
Much instrumental
Norwegian folk-music is built from small melodic themes, units which are
repeated with small variations in appoggialuras and sometimes with rhythmic
displacements. Sections are then joined together to form larger units. We seldom
find any true development as it is understood in traditional classical music.
It gradually became clear to Grieg that he felt the greatest affinity with this
music. That is why it also became so difficult to distinguish between what in
Grieg's works came originally from folk-music, and what was his own
composition. This must also have been especially difficult for foreign critics
and audiences.
In Grieg's music there
are two features which particularly attract our attention, rhythm and harmony.
In many instances Grieg's rhythm in his piano compositions is taken from the
folk-dance, as well as from compositions which are not based upon folk-music.
He placed great emphasis on the rhythmic element, and considered it paramount
in the presentation of his works which have dance as the point of departure. He
was of the opinion that in order to be able to play one of his compositions, one
had to know and feel the dance rhythm. Characteristic of his understanding of
the rhythmic element is the story about the meeting between Grieg and Ravel in Paris, in 1894, at the home
of William Molard:
While the bright-eyed
company discussed music, Ravel quietly went over to Molard's piano and
began to play one of the master's Norwegian Dances. Grieg listened with a
smile, but then began to show signs of impatience, suddenly getting up and
saying sharply: "No, young man, not like that at al1. Much more rhythm.
It' s a folk-dance, a peasant dance. You should see the peasants at home, with
a fiddler stamping in time with music. Play it again! And while Ravel played,
the little man jumped up and skipped about the room to the astonishment of the
company.'
Harmony is at the heart
of his work. Often it is the harmony itself which is the basis of the composition.
Grieg pointed this out emphatically in a letter to his biographer, Henry T. Finck:
The realm of harmony,
has always been my
dream world, and my relationship to this harmonious way of feeling and the
Norwegian Folk-songs has been a mystery even for me. 1 have I understood that
the secret depth one finds in our Folk-songs is basica/1y owing to the richness
of their untold harmonic possibilities. In my reworking of the Folk-songs Op. 66,
but also I elsewhere, l have attempted to express my interpretation of the
hidden harmonies in our Folk- I songs.'
Grieg's interest in
harmony had become obvious to others already while he was at the Conservatory.
At that time it was first and foremost a desire to experiment. Later harmony
became his way of bringing forth the very "soul" of the folk-tunes.
Among other things, he deliberately used unfamiliar, "radical" chord
progressions in order to suggest the vague tonality (sotto voce half
tones, vague thirds) such as one finds in many of the songs, a melodic
characteristic which would otherwise be impossible from an instrument like the
piano.
Grieg's instrument was
primarily the piano. From his earliest years to the concert-tour in the year he
died, he performed as a pianist his own compositions. He was not a virtuoso,
but his intimate familiarity with the piano allowed him to present his own
music in such a way as to leave a deep and lasting impression upon everyone who
heard him play. According to contemporary reports he had a marveilous ability
to bring out the best, the very essence, of his own piano pieces. When he took
his place on the platform, the atmosphere became electric, and the critics
emphasized his refined touch, tone quality, and the complete absence of
superficial gestures.
Grieg's music
contributed very modestly to the development of piano technique. Most of his
piano pieces are technically speaking within the abilities of competent
amateurs. This, together with musical characteristics which seem to have a stimulating
and refreshing effect, contributed to the fact that he was one of the most played,
and respected composers in Europe-popular, if not with the critics, then at
least with the majority of those interested in music.
Grieg's compositions
were written in the epoch of the piano. Music and piano-playing in the average
home were at a peak during the last half of the nineteenth century and the
first decades of this century. Cyril Ehrlich has calculated that in 1910 alone
more than 600,000 pianos were produced. To know how to play the piano was part
of the general education in most middle-class families, especially for girls.
No wonder the music publishers C. F. Peters hoisted the flag in London and Frankfurt every time Grieg
delivered a manuscript for a new album of piano pieces. It is also
understandable that Grieg sometimes experienced the demand for new piano pieces
as a strain. There were also times when he felt that the production of piano
pieces was a sort of bribe, or indulgence, to make sure that the
publishing-house issued his other works as well. Nevertheless, in general,
Grieg had an excellent relationship with his publisher in Leipzig. He was particularly
dose to Dr Max Abraham (1831 - 1900), who became editor at Peters in 1863. This
is dearly shown by the abundant correspondence that has been preserved. Verlagsbuchhandlung
C. F. Peters Bureau de Musique, was the full name of the
publishing- house that acted as Grieg's exclusive publisher from 1890 and
agreed to pay him 4000 Marks every year, a sum which was adjusted to 6000 Marks
in 1901. In return, Grieg was to offer Peters all of his future compositions
with rights, für allen Lander (for all countries), for a certain fee.
Grieg experienced a
great deal of adversity during certain periods of his life, but he also had
more success than most other composer colleagues of his time. Nevertheless he
never lost the feelings of unrest, of not having developed his talent to the
full degree, of having left something undone, something unfulfilled within himself.
Throughout his life, Grieg was a restless soul. He never felt completely at
peace anywhere. When he was in Bergen, he longed for Olristiania, and when he was there he longed
for Copenhagen and the continent. When
he was abroad, he longed to be back home, but no sooner had he arrived in Bergen than he felt oppressed
and restless and wanted to go off again. There were perhaps only two places
where he really felt at home and satisfied, on the concert- platform and in the
Norwegian mountains, especially Jotunheimen. When he was in the presence of his
audience or experiencing the powerful and free nature of the western part of Norway, he felt whole and
complete.
The date of composition
of larvik's Polka, EG 101, is not known, but it is probably the
earliest surviving work of Grieg. The polka is a very ordinary dance, with no
special features, but it does show that Grieg was well acquainted with the
elementary technique and rules of composition. It is quite possible that the Polka
was written in 1858, when the composer was only fifteen. The manuscript is
in Bergen Public Library and the piece was published for the first time in 1995
in Volume 20 of the new edition of the complete works of Grieg.
The 23 Small Pieces
for piano, EG 104, can be found in a manuscript book in the Bergen library with the
postscript: To be destroyed after my death; must never be
published, are mark appended to several other unpublished compositions left
at the composers death. These have, nevertheless, been published in Volume 20
of the complete edition. This booklet is a compilation of individual
compositions, although some are found in other contexts. Nos. 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 16,
18, 19 and 21 make up EG 103, under the collective title Nine Children's
Pieces, and are dedicated to his cousin, Ludovisca Riis. The manuscript is
dated 28th July 1859 and has the Opus number 17. Nos. 2, 5 and 6 are also found
in an album in the II handwriting of his sister Ingeborg Benedicte. It bears
the date of January 1859, but the .f pieces are probably earlier in origin.
Nos. 17 and 20 are dated 1858.
The total picture of
Grieg that may be derived from these compositions is that of someone who was
intimate with the piano literature of his contemporaries. His models are
Chopin, especially in the first piece, Allegro agitato, Mendelssohn and
Schumann. Characteristics of the older Grieg are hard to find. He shows
pleasure in experimenting with harmonic progressions and in general at times reveals
an astonishing maturity, but some of these pieces also bear the mark of lack of
training and of youthful arrogance. The sections where he tries to be poetic
show that his musical ideas still do not have the strength to carry them
through.
The Unveiling of the
Monument in Memory of Halfdan Kjerulf; EG 167 was originally written for male voice
choir. On 23rd September, 1874, in Christiania (Oslo), a monument in memory of the composer Halfdan Kjerulf
was unveiled. Grieg wrote for the occasion two works for male voice choir to
texts by Andreas Munch (1815-1868). These were published in Behren's Song-Book
for Men's Choirs in 1874. Kjerulf was the most important Norwegian composer
of the preceding generation and in several of his works introduced harmonic and
melodic processes suggested by Norwegian folk-music. Through these
"Norwegian" songs and especially his rearrangement of folk-tunes for
the piano, he set a precedent for the fusion of folk-music and classical music.
At the same time Grieg arranged for piano the composition, which was dedicated
to the composers wife. The manuscript of the arrangement, which is found in the
University Library in Oslo, is dated 24th
November, 1874. The piece was first published in Volume 4 of the complete Grieg
edition in 1984.
Canon for Four Voices, EG 179, was written in
1860, while Grieg was still a student at the Leipzig Conservatory .The piece is
found in a book of theory exercises which he w rote for E. F. Richter
(1808-1879) but it is an independent work that does not belong to such a book
of Conservatory exercises. The manuscript is preserved in the Grieg Collection
in the Bergen Public Library and the Canon was first published in Volume
20 of the complete edition. From a technical point of view it is very convincing,
although it can hardly be described as great music. Surprising here too are the
ingenious harmonies employed. It is uncertain which instrument Grieg had in mind,
but for this recording the organ has been chosen, as it is an instrument with
which he was quite familiar. In 1866 he took organ lessons from his friend Gottfred
Matthison-Hansen (1832-1909), since he needed some means of securing a
livelihood and it was as organists that many composers were able to make a
living.
The Concerto in B
minor for piano and orchestra, EG 120, was found posthumously among
Grieg's sketches housed now in the Grieg Collection in the Bergen Public
Library. The sketches for the proposed B minor concerto were published in
Volume 20 of the complete works. Same of these were published after the
composers death by his friend Julius Rontgen (1885-1910) in Die Musik, 7.
Jg., Volume 25 (1907-1908). According to him Grieg always took his sketches
with him when he travelled, so that he could take them out and work on them, if
the opportunity presented itself. Supposedly he started work on the piano
concerto as the result of something that was intended as a joke. In 1881 he
wrote to Dr Abraham at Peters':
I realise to my surprise
that it is very good for me to compose when I am forced to do so. I believe
that if someone paid me, let us say, .1,000 Dalers a. year in advance, that I would
relax long before the required number of Compositions were finished.5
Dr Abraham took him at
his word and replied:
I am very please that
you have such a burning desire to compose more than you have the last few
years. Therefore, I have the pleasure of sending you 3000 Marks, as you
suggested, and ask that you send me a piano concerto, some piano pieces and a
concert-overture for orchestra before September next year.'
Unfortunately Grieg did
not keep his part of the agreement. Instead he turned over a number of other
compositions to the publishing-house. In May 1883 he w rote that he had
actually begun a piano concerto but that his Muse would not budge. After this
there were no further hints of any plans for the concerto, from which fragments
of the piano part are here recorded for the first time.
The Piano Sonata in E
minor, Opus 7, has appeared on one of the earlier recordings
of the present series. It was written during a period of eleven days in the
spring of 1865 at the same time as the first violin sonata, the Sonata in F
major, Opus 8. Grieg tells us that he took both works with him to
the Danish composer Niels W. Gade (1817-1890), who at that time held a leading
position in the musical world of Europe. Gade showed great interest in the
compositions, proof of which is seen in the fact that he drained four decanters
of water while he went through them; Gade drank large amounts of water when he was
inspired. It is, therefore, not surprising that the sonata, published by Breitkopf
und Hartel in Leipzig in 1866, was dedicated
to Gade. Wilhelm Hansen in Copenhagen published a parallel edition in 1880, but in 1887 a new and
revised edition was published by Breitkopf und Hartel and Edition Peters. For this
some fundamental changes were made, notably in the second and fourth movements.
In the second movement, Andante molto, the changes in dynamics in the
last part of the movement give the musical direction a wholly new character,
compared with the revised edition of 1887. In the fourth movement, Molto
allegro, Grieg omitted all of 25 bars in the exposition in the revised
version (bars 31-55). Both movements are played here in their original form as
they were published in 1866.