Jean Sibelius (1865-1957) Symphony No. 1 in E minor, Op. 39 Symphony No. 3 in C major, Op. 52 The Finnish composer Jean Sibelius was born in 1865, the son...
Jean Sibelius
(1865-1957)
Symphony No. 1 in E
minor, Op. 39
Symphony No. 3 in C
major, Op. 52
The Finnish composer
Jean Sibelius was born in 1865, the son of a doctor, in a small town in the
south of Finland. The language and culture of his family, as with others of
their class and background at the time, was Swedish. It was at school that
Sibelius was to learn Finnish and acquire his first real interest in the early
legends of a country that had become an autonomous grand-duchy of the Tsar of
Russia in the period after the defeat of Charles XII of Sweden at Poltava in
1709. Throughout the later nineteenth century there were divisions between the
Swedish-speaking upper classes and the Finnish-speaking people, the cause of
the latter embraced by influential nationalists, and accentuated by the
repressive measures instituted by Tsar Nicholas II, before the revolution of
1905. In this society Sibelius was deeply influenced by his association with
the family of General Jarnefelt, whose daughter Aino became his wife.
Nevertheless Swedish remained his mother tongue, in which he expressed himself
with greater fluency than in Finnish.
The musical abilities
of Sibelius were soon realised, although not developed early enough to suggest
music as a possible profession, until he had entered university in Helsinki as
a law student. His first ambition had been to be a violinist. It later became
apparent that any ability he had in this respect - and here his own violin
concerto would have offered insurmountable technical difficulties for him - was
far outweighed by his gifts as a composer, developed first by study in Helsinki
with Martin Wegelius, then with the pedantic Becker in Berlin and with
Goldmark, and more effectively, with Robert Fuchs in Vienna.
In Finland once more,
Sibelius won almost immediate success in 1892 with a symphonic poem, Kullervo,
based on an episode from the Finnish epic, the Kalevala. There
followed compositions of particular national appeal that further enhanced his
reputation in Helsinki, including the incidental music to the student patriotic
pageant Karelia, En Saga and the Lemminkainen Suite.
During this period
Sibelius supported himself and his wife by teaching, as well as by composition
and the performance of his works, but it proved difficult for him to earn
enough, given, as he was, to bouts of extravagance, continuing the practice of
his days as a student. In 1896 he was voted the position of professor at the
University of Helsinki, but the committee's decision was overturned in favour of
Robert Kajanus, the experienced founder and conductor of the first professional
orchestra in Helsinki. As consolation for his disappointment, Sibelius was
awarded a government stipend for ten years, and this was later changed into a
pension for life. The sum involved was never enough to meet his gift for
improvidence, inherited, perhaps, from his father, who, at his death in 1868,
had left his family bankrupt.
Sibelius continued his
active career as a composer until 1926, his fame increasing at home and abroad.
The successful First Symphony of 1898 was followed by the still more
successful Finlandia. Busoni had tried to arrange the publication of his
music by the benefactor of later Russian musical nationalism, Belyayev, on the
plea that Finns were, in a sense, Russians, or at least citizens of a Russian
grand-duchy. This came to nothing, but publication by Breitkopf and Hartel
ensured a wider public abroad than provincial Finland could ever have offered.
The Second
Symphony, in 1902, won an unprecedented success in Helsinki. This was
followed by the Violin Concerto, a Third Symphony and, after an
illness that put an end for the moment to any indulgence in alcohol and
tobacco, a Fourth, with travel to the major musical centres of Europe
and international honour. The Fifth Symphony was written during the war,
after which Sibelius wrote only four more works of any substance, the Sixth and
Seventh Symphonies, incidental music for Shakespeare's The Tempest and,
in 1926, the symphonic poem Tapiola. An Eighth Symphony was
completed in 1929, but destroyed. The rest was silence. For the last 25 years
of his life Sibelius wrote nothing, now isolated from and largely antipathetic
to contemporary trends in music. His reputation in Britain and America remained
high, although there were inevitable reactions to the excessive enthusiasm of
his supporters. On the continent of Europe he failed to recapture the position
that he had earlier known in pre-war Germany, in France and in Vienna. He died
in 1957 at the age of 91.
Sibelius completed his
Symphony No. 1 in E minor, Opus 39, in 1898 and it received its first
performance in April the following year under the direction of the composer in
a concert that also included his new Song of the Athenians, a work that
used a text by Viktor Rydberg and was seen as an immediate response to the
Russianising policies of the Governor-General Bobrikov, who was later
assassinated by a Finnish patriot. The choral work and the symphony were
welcomed with equal warmth, although critics at once sought a possible
programme for the second of these, seeing it as a sequel to earlier orchestral
works of overt national programmatic content.
The first movement of
the symphony starts with a long-drawn clarinet melody, over the sound of the
timpani. After this the strings enter, suggesting first the tonality of G major
rather than E minor. The introduction contains the seed of what follows in the
tripartite Allegro, with its two subjects, the gentler second related to
the first. There is a central development and recapitulation, although the
great sweep of the music may conceal the underlying structure. The poetic and
strongly felt Andante is again closely interwoven in its material, with
a central contrapuntal episode for bassoons for which Sibelius claimed a
strongly Finnish character, and a return of its intensely romantic first theme.
The Scherzo bursts upon the listener, its opening rhythm repeated with
vehemence by the timpani. To this the central trio offers a tranquil contrast.
Influenced, perhaps, by the Symphonie pathetique of Tchaikovsky that he
had heard in Helsinki two years before, Sibelius uses the clarinet melody of
the opening of the symphony to start the last movement, now entrusted to the
violins that impart to it a greater degree of poignant yearning, a feeling that
finally prevails, before the resignation of the last chords.
In 1905 Sibelius
visited England for the first time, at the invitation of Granville Bantock,
through whose agency, and that of Henry Wood and others, his music had begun to
create a very favourable impression both in the provinces and in London. The
composer was, in turn, favourably impressed by the English and the practical
result of his brief stay was a commission from the Royal Philharmonic Society
for anew symphony, his third, to be performed under his direction early in
1907. In the event the work was delayed and was performed for the first time in
Helsinki in September in a programme that included the symphonic fantasia Pohjola's
Daughter, music of more obvious contemporary appeal. It was introduced to
the St Petersburg public in November, when its first two movements, at least,
pleased Rimsky-Korsakov, who commented on its difference from Russian music,
although he added that the apparent originality might be simply superficial.
Glazunov had taken exception to the closing material, the sinister hushed and
relatively discordant scale in contrary motion, of the first-movement
exposition, but the performance of the work in St Petersburg is an indication
of the international attention that Sibelius was now receiving. The composer
conducted the new symphony, dedicated to Granville Bantock, in London in 1908.
Symphony No. 3 in C major, Opus 52, is classical in its
proportions and in general lacks the overtly national characteristics of the
earlier and later symphonies of Sibelius. The first movement opens with
material that, as it is developed, is bound to suggest, if only fleetingly,
Mahler in his favourite countryside. An unusual and harmonically remote minor
key is chosen for the second subject and the exposition ends with a curious
scale in discordant contrary motion, followed by a closely argued central
development, before the return of the first theme in recapitulation, with its
second subject in a key to correspond to its earlier appearance. The unusual
key of G sharp minor is chosen for the slow movement, giving it an immediate
feeling of remoteness, with its gentle woodwind melody accompanied by plucked
strings, growing in intensity and leading to a deeply felt passage for strings,
joined by the woodwind. Closely integrated material, analysed either as a form
of rondo or even, if the relationship of the episodic material is thought close
enough, as variations, leads to a final movement that starts as a scherzo. There
are references to something of what has passed and a fragmented thematic
texture, before the emergence of a hymn-like theme, which is used to lead to a
conclusion of ultimate triumph.>