Bela Bartok (1881-1945) Concerto for Viola and Orchestra, (revised edition) Two Pictures, Op.10 Sz. 46 Concerto for Viola and Orchestra, Sz. 120 (completed...
Bela Bartok
(1881-1945)
Concerto for Viola and
Orchestra, (revised edition)
Two Pictures, Op.10
Sz. 46
Concerto for Viola and
Orchestra, Sz. 120 (completed by Tibor Serly)
Tibor Serly
(1901-1978)
Rhapsody for Viola and
Orchestra
Bela Bartok arrived in New York on 30th October, 1940 and remained in
America until his death on 26th September, 1945. These final five years were
not a particularly happy time for him, having left his beloved Hungary as a
refugee, fleeing the impending Nazi occupation, and being immersed in a culture
both foreign and not entirely palatable to him. In spite of the hardships
endured during this time he wrote his Concerto for Orchestra, Sonata for
solo violin and the Third Piano Concerto. In addition he left behind
an unfinished Viola Concerto, which had been commissioned by the
Scottish viola virtuoso, William Primrose. The Hungarian-born composer, violist
and conductor, Tibor Serly, was asked by the Bartok family to bring the work to
a publishable form. This task he undertook between 1945 and 1949, resulting in
the version that has been widely performed for the last half century. Since the
first performance in December 1949 it has remained a controversial work with
opinions ranging from its outright dismissal as a work of Bartok, through to it
being a fine, but incomplete example of his final period. Over the last twenty
years the scholarly research of violists, notably Atar Arad, Csaba Erdelyi and
the present writer, has led to significant amendments to the work of Tibor
Serly which, while executed in performances, have not been published owing to
the restrictions of copyright. It was with considerable pleasure that the viola
community welcomed the release in 1995, by Peter Bartok, the composer's son, of
the manuscript sketches in a facsimile edition, prefaced by the acclaimed
Hungarian Bartok scholar, Laszlo Somfai. In
association with this release, Boosey & Hawkes published a new revision,
prepared by Nelson Dellamaggiore under Peter Bartok's supervision, with violist
Paul Neubauer as editorial adviser. The question which immediately comes to
mind when producing a double recording such as this is as to what the
difference is between the two version. In response one must point out that many
of the changes are so subtle that even veteran performers of the work may not
immediately perceive them. In particular these types of changes relate to
subtle differences in orchestration and note corrections in the orchestral
texture. To those who already know this work well, the more obvious changes are
the numerous corrected notes in the solo viola part, comprising over 180
changed pitches and well over 200 notes moved to different octaves. The
connoisseur will also detect the removal of some thirty bars which were added
by Tibor Serly for reasons he felt were well justified The other features, which
may perhaps be viewed more in the realm of the individual performer's
interpretation, are those relating to speeds of the various passages and the
choices of dynamics. These differences could, of course, be present in two
different performances of the same version. To the listener who is not already
familiar with the work, the differences will more likely be noticed in the
overall flavour of the versions.
Obviously the above-mentioned aspects all contribute to the resulting
effect but the one remaining and not insignificant aspect is that of bowing and
articulation. For several decades we have become accustomed to the character
produced by the suggestions of Tibor Serly and William Primrose, suggestions which
now are significantly challenged by violists who have studied the sketches in
depth. Owing to the lack of indication from Bartok of any articulations, this
remains the one area in which each performer will continue to establish his or
her own interpretation, and in which one has arguably the most scope to
establish the overall character of the work. If the performer follows the
markings as indicated by Tibor Serly and William Primrose or Nelson
Dellamaggiore and Paul Neubauer, then it should be noted that these are the
interpretations of those musicians, and not necessarily those of Bartok. There
are four very obvious differences worthy of a special mention. First, in the
linking section between the end of the first movement and the beginning of the second
movement, Serly's bassoon solo has been removed. Secondly, in the middle
section of the second movement the woodwind flourishes, added by Serly, have
also been removed. Thirdly, the link from the second movement to the Finale has
been extended in the new version, based on material in the sketch unused by
Serly. Finally, Serly's four-bar insertion of the full orchestra, just before
the final ascending scale of the solo viola, has been removed, creating a more
fluent ending to the work. While the new revision has been welcomed, it has,
along with the facsimile, given the signal to violists that this work is no
longer an exclusive preserve, that the full story of this very popular concerto
is now available, and that the search for the definitive rendition will
continue to challenge musicians well into the future.
Bela Bartok's Two Pictures, Op. 10, Viragzas ('In Full
Flower') and A fulu tanca ('The Village Dance') were written in Budapest
in August 1910, transcribed for piano, but not performed in the orchestral
version until 26th February, 1913. While in many respects Bartok had already
developed his own distinctive style, these works represent the significant
influence of Debussy, whose music he had become acquainted with only three
years earlier. Together with Two Portraits (1907-8) and Four Pieces (1912),
the Two Pictures mark the end of his writing for full orchestra (except
for stage works), until 1923-24, when he produced his Dance Suite. Of
his orchestral works, the Two Pictures have one of the more extravagant
requirements for players with the usual complement augmented by an extra of
each wind, four trumpets and a celeste. As the titles suggest, the first
movement is a slow atmospheric piece, conjuring up images perhaps of the
vineyards of the French countryside and the second is a lively dance with strongly
accented off-beats and a distinct folky element. In Budapest the Two
Pictures was the most performed work of Bartok during his lifetime.
Tibor Serly's association with Bela Bartok was for him both a blessing
and a curse Without doubt, his efforts to make Bartok's music more accessible,
by arranging selected works for combinations of instruments, brought him more
attention than did his own compositions. For the most part his effort, were
highly praised, both by Bartok and by colleagues. It was in fact the Viola
Concerto of Bartok which brought him so much anguish. It was after all the
only work of his mentor that he worked on which was incomplete, and it was
through his efforts to bridge the gap and produce a completed work, that he
encountered his only real criticism. This soured his attitude to musicologists
and critics in general and did not enhance his own reputation as a composer.
However, as his Rhapsody for Viola and Orchestra, written in the years
1946- 48, demonstrates, Serly was a composer of some stature in his own right
and deserves to be remembered as such. Of particular interest with the Rhapsody
is the fact that it was produced in exactly the same period that he was
reconstructing Bartok's Viola Concerto. While there is no obvious
borrowing from the Viola Concerto in evidence, Serly did freely
acknowledge the source of several Hungarian folk-songs from Bartok's piano
transcriptions For Children. The work consists of small and larger excerpts
of these pieces, with connecting quasi-improvisatory passages and, some
particularly rich, brooding sections well utilising the viola's lower strings
early on. The pieces themselves are embellished with some stylish arabesques
and glissandi.
Janos Kovacs
Janos Kovacs studied conducting at the Liszt Academy of Music in
Budapest under Andras Korodi, graduating in 1973, when he became a conductor at
the State Opera there. During the summers of 1979-81 he was musical assistant
to Pierre Boulez in Bayreuth for performances of The Ring cycle and also
for productions of The Flying Dutchman, Tannhauser and Parsifal. Janos
Kovacs has been awarded the Hungarian government's prestigious Liszt Prize and
in 1987 was appointed first conductor of the Hungarian State Opera. In addition
to his work in the opera-house, he is regularly invited to conduct the leading
Hungarian symphony orchestras in a demanding repertoire. His career has also
taken him abroad to conduct major orchestras throughout Europe and as far afield
as Japan. His operatic repertoire ranges from Mozart to Verdi, Wagner, Richard
Strauss and Alban Berg and he has been responsible for a number of recordings
with various orchestras in Hungary and abroad.